[78-L] Fwd: Re: Re: First real LP

dlennick dlennick dlennick at sympatico.ca.invalid
Mon Feb 28 19:19:22 PST 2022


I thunk it's safe to say that most of the Indies after 1945 were 
mastering on 16" (Mercury, Cosmo, Signature, MGM, Musicraft, Majestic) 
given that the LP reissues or even some of the pre-1950 transfers to 
other 78 labels were dubs that didn't sound like lifts from other 78s.

I had a 50s pressing of Alfred Newman's "Street Scene" (Mercury) that's 
from an original lacquer with cue scratch leading up to the first note.

My 2 cents.

dl


    ------ Original Message ------
    From: burnhamd at rogers.com.invalid
    To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
    Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 8:53 PM
    Subject: Re: [78-L] Fwd: Re: Re: First real LP


  To Cary

  I think the main development that enabled all the “shoestring” 
companies after WW II was the introduction of the Webcor tape recorder 
which allowed anyone with a couple of hundred dollar bills to spare 
become a recording engineer able to make half decent low budget 
recordings!  This was the first time the technology was within the grasp 
of the home hobbyists. Depending on the quality of the microphone and 
the group being recorded, one could make recordings whose quality 
rivaled the best commercial records of the day!

  db

  Sent from my iPhone

  > On Feb 28, 2022, at 20:08, Hotmail <soundthink at live.com.invalid> 
wrote:
  >
  > 
  > How do you know this? There were hundreds of shoestring budget 
record companies that sprang up after WWII. Did they all use this 
technology?
  >
  > Cary
  >
  >> On Feb 28, 2022, at 4:37 PM, dlennick dlennick  wrote:
  >>
  >> 
  >> As I said (in a message which may or may not show up). Columbia 
began
  >> recording on 16" late in 1939.
  >>
  >> dl
  >>
  >>
  >>   ------ Original Message ------
  >>   From: mbiel at mbiel.com.invalid
  >>   To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
  >>   Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 7:18 PM
  >>   Subject: Re: [78-L] Fwd: Re: Re: First real LP
  >>
  >>
  >> Well then, with that requirement, there were practically no 78s 
issued
  >> after 1942.  Almost EVERY record was mastered on 16-inch lacquers 
after
  >> the resumption of recording after the AFM strike.
  >> Michael Biel.
  >>
  >> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
  >> ________________________________
  >> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
  >> <78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com> on behalf of RODMANLEWIS
  >> <julianvein at gmail.com.invalid>
  >> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 6:36:22 PM
  >> To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
  >> Subject: Re: [78-L] Fwd: Re: Re: First real LP
  >>
  >>
  >>>
  >>> I don't consider 78s dubbed from 16" acetates or whatever genuine
  >> 78s.
  >>>
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> 78-L mailing list
  >> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
  >> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> 78-L mailing list
  >> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
  >> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> 78-L mailing list
  >> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
  >> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
  > _______________________________________________
  > 78-L mailing list
  > 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
  > http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l

  _______________________________________________
  78-L mailing list
  78-L at klickitat.78online.com
  http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l






More information about the 78-L mailing list