[78-L] Robert Johnson
David Lennick
dlennick at sympatico.ca
Sat Mar 22 12:14:59 PDT 2014
That idiotic theory about Robert Johnson's records being at the wrong speed has
surfaced again (sorry to divert the list from rock 'n' roll). I don't know who
wrote the following but it should certainly settle the issue forever. Of course
it won't. Repeated from Bruce Conforth's posting on Facebook.
dl
RE: ARE ROBERT JOHNSON'S RECORDINGS AT THE CORRECT SPEED
Here's an interesting note a friend of mine just posted about the theory of
some that Johnson's recordings are at the wrong speed
"A friend of mine is the lead archive engineer for Sony: l asked him about
this, and here's his incredibly detailed answer, which is the last word on it, imo:
"This again? *sigh* Okay, first of all we have established that there was
nothing at either recording location, Dallas or San Antonio, that was wrong
electrically that might have caused a change in pitch. Plus, these sessions
were separated by a period of weeks or months as well as miles. The reason I
know that there were no electrical issues is that we ordered in a number of
recordings of other performers from each of those days and they are in (or very
close to) correct keys. So, that eliminates that as a possible factor. What has
often been thrown around out there is that they decided to speed up the
recordings to make them more energetic, ie. uptempo. If that were the case Don
Law would have had to have decided to SLOW DOWN the recording on site or make
changes to the pitch after the fact by making a disc-to-disc dub, changing the
speed of the original and recording at normal speed for the dub. In the first
case you wouldn't know your result until after the fact. Remember you have to
plate metal masters and press before you hear the recording. I doubt they would
have tried to playback freshly cut wax. Suppose it sounds like shit? In the
second case we would have heard not just the surface noise of the masters we
were playing but ALSO the surface noise from the discs they were speeding up
and recording from. We didn't hear that. Another question would be: why would
they decide to take the recordings of an itinerant black blues musician and
lavish attention on them in that way? Incurring additional costs to sell in the
"colored" market? Highly unlikely. And, yes, we have listened to the original
metal masters for a good chunk of those recordings from both sessions. They DO
exist. They were rediscovered around five or six years ago. So, in short, no,
they were not sped up. People just want there to be some great mystery
surrounding these legendary recordings. That's all."
More information about the 78-L
mailing list