[78-L] "And Ray Anthony..."

[Taylor Bowie]

Hi Jeff,

I'm thinking in terms of the place of each band in the minds and memories of 
the public,  who have emotional connections to some music which has little 
to do with quality.

One could also say that the Miller AEF band would not have existed if the 
civilian band hadn't become the most popular band of the time.

I'll admit that the sound of the Miller civilian band as captured on the 
Bluebird and Victor records appeals to me very much...my preference may be 
because I've spent so much time listening to my faves from '38 to '42 and 
not as much to the service band.

The civilian band on record has a sharp,  tight,  wound-up sound which just 
"gets" me...hard to describe,  but it has an emotional and visceral punch 
which logic says shouldn't affect me,  but it does.

Like on "Skylark."  After the muted brass passage at the beginning,  the 
whole fat,  obvious,  gimmicky Miller reed section comes in...and it still 
just slays me every time.

I think of the Harry James Columbia of You Made Me Love You the same 
way...these are records which just push my buttons,  even though there's 
nothing very subtle about them!

Someone in another forum pointed out that Ray Anthony is still with us,  and 
he is on some of the civilian band records as well.

Taylor


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Sultanof" <jeffsultanof at gmail.com>
To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 8:15 PM
Subject: Re: [78-L] Paul Tanner, last surviving member of Glenn Miller's 
orchestra, dies


> Taylor,
>
> You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but I will state mine this 
> way.
> If I had a choice to make between the Miller 1938-42 band and the AEF, for
> me the choice is easy. The AEF band was pure Miller in its sound (it used
> many of the arrangements that were played by the civilian band), blended
> better and swung harder. In many ways, it was as if the original Miller
> band added strings and stayed on the road when new arrangements entered 
> the
> book. I would certainly look at it as classic.
>
> Jeff Sultanof
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Taylor Bowie <bowiebks at isomedia.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> I guess a case could be made,  but I'd define the classic Miller band as
>> the
>> one which the public knew and loved of the 1939 - 42 period...the one 
>> which
>> made the records which made the band the most popular of the era...and
>> still
>> the most popular,  70 years later.
>>
>> Taylor
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Julian Vein" <julianvein at blueyonder.co.uk>
>> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 4:34 PM
>> Subject: Re: [78-L] Paul Tanner, last surviving member of Glenn Miller's
>> orchestra, dies
>>
>>
>> > On 07/02/13 00:30, Taylor Bowie wrote:
>> >> I don't think Peck is considered part of the "classic" Miller band. 
>> >> Kay
>> >> made that one record but was only with the band for a couple of weeks,
>> >> as I
>> >> recall.
>> >>
>> >> Bassist Trigger Alpert is now the last living member of the famous
>> Miller
>> >> band.
>> >>
>> >> Taylor
>> >>
>> > ============
>> > What are the qualifications to be considered a Miller alumnus? I would
>> > have thought that Miller had two "classic" periods: the civilian and 
>> > the
>> > AEF bands.
>> >
>> >       Julian Vein
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > 78-L mailing list
>> > 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> > http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>