[78-L] Victor 24351 with 2 3/4" label (Oakland pressing): normal?

[Royal Pemberton]

So this smaller size is on a lot of 24XXX numbers?  I wonder why they went
to such a small size?

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Taylor Bowie <bowiebks at isomedia.com> wrote:

> Mine is the same size (It's an Armstrong for those of you who don't file by
> number!) and it looks to be the same label size  as many other Victors of
> that series,  including several Isham Jones,  etc.
>
> Taylor
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Royal Pemberton" <ampex354 at gmail.com>
> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 5:38 PM
> Subject: [78-L] Victor 24351 with 2 3/4" label (Oakland pressing): normal?
>
>
> >I found this record today at the local Salvation Army, and noticed the
> >label
> > being smaller than usual.  The sides are not unusually long, nor do the
> > eccentric stop grooves appear to run a smaller diameter than on
> > contemporaneous Victors.  Is this smaller label the norm for all
> pressings
> > of this record, or just the Oakland?  Are there any other Victors of the
> > era
> > with this same smaller size label?
> > _______________________________________________
> > 78-L mailing list
> > 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> > http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>