[78-L] my first Monarch (Early Sleeves?)

[Matthew Duncan]

I would think stitched card sleeves with no details on is how these records were delivered to stores and then some stores would print details on the sleeves or have their own sleeves made.

This is just a theory...also in England, many card covers simply bore the term "Gramophone Record" around the hole area on the sleeve and these were either stitched or taped up at the edges and these housed records during the 1900 to 1920 period before shop covers really took off.

Matthew Duncan.




________________________________
From: "bruce78rpm at comcast.net" <bruce78rpm at comcast.net>
To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Sun, 28 March, 2010 15:27:41
Subject: Re: [78-L] my first Monarch (Early Sleeves?)

That is interesting, I can never recall seeing either Berliners or early Victors, Monarchs or Columbias in anyone's collection in an original sleeve of any kind. I wonder how these records were original sold. It is hard to believe that they just handed you the record without a protective sleeve . Does anyone have the answer? 

Bruce 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: neechevoneeznayou at gmail.com 
To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com> 
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 10:08:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [78-L] my first Monarch 

I don't have and never had any sleeves for my earliest records. Did 
Berliners come in sleeves? 

joe salerno 


bruce78rpm at comcast.net wrote: 
> I have Monarchs in my Collection both Dog and Pre-dog and 7" & 10". I have never seen any specific sleeves for these records. What type of record sleeve were they sold with? Does anyone have an original Monarch or early Dog or Pre-dog Monarch Record sleeve they can show us ? 
> 
> Bruce 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "George Anglin" <packardmarmon1940 at sbcglobal.net> 
> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com> 
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 3:31:19 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
> Subject: Re: [78-L] my first Monarch 
> 
> I have several monarchs and curious as to their actual dates. My favorites are Dan W. Quinn doing "GENERAL HARD TACK" Nr. 2667, and Him doing " BILL BAILEY, WON'T YOU PLEASE COME HOME Nr. 1411. I think Bill Bailey is 1902 and Hard Tack is 1904. Am I right? They are scarce now although I found mine over 50 years ago at thrift stores in Tucson Ariz. Thanks. George Anglin 
> 
> --- On Sat, 3/20/10, neechevoneeznayou at gmail.com <neechevoneeznayou at gmail.com> wrote: 
> 
> From: neechevoneeznayou at gmail.com <neechevoneeznayou at gmail.com> 
> Subject: [78-L] my first Monarch 
> To: "78-l" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com> 
> Date: Saturday, March 20, 2010, 10:07 PM 
> 
> Finally acquired one. I've only seen 2, one 7" and one 10". Wish I could 
> have got the smaller one also but it was for sale only with the 
> machine in an antique store. 
> 
> This one os Monarch 2376, 10" sf "beautiful bells chime on trinity 
> chime". Is the date known? When was the Monarch labelin use? 
> Monarch and Record are on either side of hole, dog/phono are on top 
> 
> This is only Monarch style label I've ever seen, and is not like the one 
> in Kurt's current Nauction. 
> 
> All info appreciated. 
> 
> joe salerno 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> 78-L mailing list 
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com 
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l 
> _______________________________________________ 
> 78-L mailing list 
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com 
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l 
> _______________________________________________ 
> 78-L mailing list 
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com 
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l 
> 

_______________________________________________ 
78-L mailing list 
78-L at klickitat.78online.com 
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l 
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l