I collect all sorts of records from that era that you speak of, not from a standpoint of Racism or Prejudice, but from a standpoint of recorded sound history. Obviously what was acceptable entertainment then, is not socially acceptable now, but I am happy that I am able preserve this small peek at what Minstrels, and racial and ethical stereotypical humor was like back in the early formulative days of recorded sound. We were a large "melting pot" back then and it was only natural that humor and comedy that poked fun at perceived stereotypes, would emerge as a major form of entertainment on record and in vaudville and even early films. This was an age when Minstrel shows even on the local level were still popular and as I recall still being held as late as the mid-50's. Jolson started out in Minstrelsy and milked the sentimentality of it right up until the end. Does that make him a racist or a bigot? I don't think so. These things are and will always be a part of recorded sound history,not to be hidden because they are today socially unaccetable, but embraced as historical examples of what entertainment was like in the early years, and also as a lesson to show how far we have come. We just elected our first African American President, so you can't get anymore post racial than that !!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom" <nice_guy_with_an_mba at yahoo.com>
To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 12:07:09 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [78-L] Race observations
What is it, exactly, about American art forms that depict African-Americans in the most demeaning, pejorative, and degrading light that you guys find redeeming and worthwhile?
I'd really like to know.
You guys are big fans of Al Jolson (and now, it seems, his source of inspriation, if you want to call it that, Stephen Foster) who made a career of sorts, by depicting African-Americans as wide-eyed, lustful, disorganized, ignorant and inferior to whites.
Is there supposed to be something ennobling artistically in those sorts of stereotypes? If so, would you mind expanding on what it is?
What about Buckwheat and Amos-'n-Andy? You guys overlooked them.
And the use of the word "nigger" to refer to people of African American descent was always derogatory, offensive and racist and still is irrespective of whether it appeared in Broadway shows, in movies, on the stage, in audio recordings or elsewhere. It was never quaint or affectionate, much less "endearing".
And by the way, no one performs Stephen Foster or Al Jolson songs any more and for good reason.
--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Chris Zwarg <doctordisc at truesoundtransfers.de> wrote:
From: Chris Zwarg <doctordisc at truesoundtransfers.de>
Subject: Re: [78-L] Race observations
To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 4:08 AM
At 07:04 23.01.2009, you wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "DAVID BURNHAM" <burnhamd at rogers.com>
>>In the generation before ours, (Steven's
>> and mine), the n-word seemed to be acceptable even in polite company.
It
>> occurs twice in the 1936 recording of "Mikado", famously in
"Showboat",
>> many times in the Shilkret album of Stephen Foster and, of course, in
>> countless "coon song" records. To my knowledge, in none of
these cases is
>> the term used derogatorily, in fact in some cases it's used
>> affectionately.
At face value it is derogatory in "Mikado", but Gilbert put it there
in a farcical vein, as part of Ko-Ko's "little list" of despicable
individuals he'd like to see executed. A few moments later it is revealed in
the story that despite this mighty rant - BTW set to the most tip-toeing and
non-ranting music imaginable - he couldn't even kill a bluebottle. The
ominous list contains among others the author himself ("the judicial
humorist" - Gilbert had been a lawyer before he turned to writing
operettas), and traditionally, in the last verse, any current celebrity the
singer and producer find a way to fit into the metre.
I didn't dare to say this yesterday, but now I'll chime in that I
always found both the Foster and "coon" songs I heard on old records
endearing rather than condescending. I have no problem imagining the
"heroes" of many of these songs as likeable real persons I could get
along with splendidly - precisely the last thing a racist (as I understand that
word) would want.
All the songs you quote are so far removed from being racist agitprop that the
cuts or bowdlerizations common today to remove the "offensive" word(s)
- or in case of Foster the suppression of the whole genre from the current
repertoire except maybe as instrumental pieces - strike me as showing a lack of
respect for the integrity of these works of art. To not use a word today in
conversation - as I learned the hard way here very recently - is one thing, to
"correct" long-dead authors something very different, and endorsing
one does not make the other more palatable. It's like deciding that, with
our today's listening expectations, the lack of "blue" notes and
jazz phrasing in Beethoven's 9th is a defect and should be
"remedied" to "improve" the work.
Chris Zwarg
>You might say that because I'm not Afro-American myself,
>> that I have no right to express an opinion on how offensive this might
be
>> and I would offer no argument to that observation. I can never
experience
>> the life of a black in a white community but I have found myself
amongst
>> entirely black groups of friends and had them calling me names that
are
>> the counter-parts of the n-word in that community but we were fooling
>> around and no offense on either part was intended or felt.
>>
>> I can foresee the day when the term "gay" is going to be
unacceptable.
>>
>> I know there are many Jewish posters on this list and while the word
"Jew"
>> is probably how they would refer to themselves, I'm sure
they've all heard
>> that word used in an offensive context. Sometimes I believe there is
too
>> much emphasis put on a word and too little on the genuine feelings
between
>> groups in society. A couple of decades ago, the term "frog"
was introduced
>> as an derogatory term for Quebecers but instead of being offended by
it,
>> they ran with it, introducing terms such as "frog power" and
it lost it's
>> impact. Back in the late 50s and early 60s the term "dummie"
was
>> considered politically incorrect, (although that description
wasn't in use
>> yet), but today the term has been cleared, probably because the term
can
>> no longer be used to refer to someone who is mute so it now only has
one
>> meaning, (political correctness for dummies). You still often see
plumbing
>> connections which are called "Siamese connections", okay
perhaps because
>> there
>> is no longer a country by that name. Are we still using the term
"Dutch
>> treat" or "going Dutch"? That word itself is offensive
to some
>> Nederlanders while others say that's what they are. I don't
know what
>> "Indian giver" has been replaced by.
>> Anyway, that's my $.02 worth!
>>
>Point being that the unacceptability of "N****r" in my post...and
in my
>growing up...
>was strictly a PERSONAL experience!! This was NOT standard among those
>of my age demographic...it was just the way *I* was told to behave...!!
>
>Sadly, the human race is divided into easily identifiable groups...almost
>ALL of
>whom cordially hate one another!
>
>...stevenc
>
>_______________________________________________
>78-L mailing list
>78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l