[78-L] 1952 lacquer record question

Taylor Bowie bowiebks at isomedia.com.invalid
Thu Aug 25 18:19:34 PDT 2022


When I was actively collecting,  I always enjoyed finding sound effects records...the stranger the better...there is a green label Gennet of a flock of sheep making the usual baa-baa sheep noises...at one point you can hear (faintly) a human voice who I think is trying to encourage the sheep to be more vocal.

 

Not exactly Bix playing Singin' the Blues,  but still entertaining!  😃 

 

Taylor

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com <78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com> On Behalf Of Malcolm
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 12:15 PM
To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Subject: Re: [78-L] 1952 lacquer record question

 

 

Hi Taylor, Hi Dave.

Nice to hear from you both. That means there are at least 3 of us still on 78L!

I'm going to try the flip side with an LP stylus. At the weights we're using nowadays it shouldn't be a problem.

Label sez that tracking should be no more than 2 ounces. That made sense in 1952, but not for an LP.

I think I will be able to stay under that.

Mal

 

*******

 

On 8/25/2022 7:46 AM, dlennick wrote:

> I've wondered about that myself..I have a 16" that looks as if it's 

> fine grooved.

> 

> dl

> 

> 

>      ------ Original Message ------

>      From:  <mailto:bowiebks at isomedia.com.invalid> bowiebks at isomedia.com.invalid

>      To:  <mailto:78-l at klickitat.78online.com> 78-l at klickitat.78online.com

>      Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 1:21 PM

>      Subject: Re: [78-L] 1952 lacquer record question

> 

> 

>    Malcolm,

> 

>    I have no information on this record but wanted to let you know 

> that I'm

>    still here,  and always glad to hear from anyone on the list!

> 

>    Best to all from

> 

>    Taylor Bowie

> 

> 

> 

> 

>    -----Original Message-----

>    From:  <mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com> 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com

>    < <mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com> 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com> On Behalf Of Malcolm

>    Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 10:16 AM

>    To: 78-L Mail List < <mailto:78-l at klickitat.78online.com> 78-l at klickitat.78online.com>

>    Subject: [78-L] 1952 lacquer record question

> 

> 

>    Hello to whoever is left on this list!

>    I recently received a 1952 NBC Reference Recording #113 - a sound 

> effects

>    record. It's called "Buzzing Sound" and penned in below that is 

> "Flying

>    Saucers". It is a 78... BUT it looks to me as if it is meant to be 

> played

>    with a LP stylus. The grooves per inch are high and the groove 

> itself is far

>    thinner than that of a normal 78. Was this the case with other NBC

>    instantaneous discs from the time? - I want to avoid damaging the 

> recording

>    by using a 2.7 mil 78 stylus if that is so. Thus my question.

>    Aloha,

>    Malcolm R

>    _______________________________________________

>    78-L mailing list

>     <mailto:78-L at klickitat.78online.com> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com

>     <http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l

> 

>    _______________________________________________

>    78-L mailing list

>     <mailto:78-L at klickitat.78online.com> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com

>     <http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l

> 

> 

> 

> 

> _______________________________________________

> 78-L mailing list

>  <mailto:78-L at klickitat.78online.com> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com

>  <http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l

 

_______________________________________________

78-L mailing list

 <mailto:78-L at klickitat.78online.com> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com

 <http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l



More information about the 78-L mailing list