[78-L] Fwd: Re: Re: First real LP

[Hotmail]

How do you know this? There were hundreds of shoestring budget record companies that sprang up after WWII. Did they all use this technology?

Cary

> On Feb 28, 2022, at 4:37 PM, dlennick dlennick <dlennick at sympatico.ca.invalid> wrote:
> 
> 
> As I said (in a message which may or may not show up). Columbia began 
> recording on 16" late in 1939.
> 
> dl
> 
> 
>    ------ Original Message ------
>    From: mbiel at mbiel.com.invalid
>    To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
>    Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 7:18 PM
>    Subject: Re: [78-L] Fwd: Re: Re: First real LP
> 
> 
>  Well then, with that requirement, there were practically no 78s issued 
> after 1942.  Almost EVERY record was mastered on 16-inch lacquers after 
> the resumption of recording after the AFM strike.
>  Michael Biel.
> 
>  Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>  ________________________________
>  From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com 
> <78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com> on behalf of RODMANLEWIS 
> <julianvein at gmail.com.invalid>
>  Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 6:36:22 PM
>  To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>  Subject: Re: [78-L] Fwd: Re: Re: First real LP
> 
> 
>> 
>> I don't consider 78s dubbed from 16" acetates or whatever genuine 
> 78s.
>> 
>  _______________________________________________
>  78-L mailing list
>  78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>  http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>  _______________________________________________
>  78-L mailing list
>  78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>  http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l