[78-L] For 78's, What Does Transcription Mean?

Thu Apr 2 05:17:19 PDT 2020

Thanks, Mike. That’s information I’d never encountered. The biographers are often as reliable as Hollywood. 

Rodger Holtin
78-L Member Since MCMXCVIII

For Best Results Use Victor Needles

Sent from my sluggish old iPhone, which explainz any bad typjng, bad spellimg, nonsensical word choices, delays and all other lapses. 

> On Apr 2, 2020, at 4:10 AM, Michael Biel <mbiel at mbiel.com.invalid> wrote:
> 
> 
> Bing’s desire to pre-record his program was ONLY to be able to edit. It had NOTHING to do with his golf schedule or any other leisure activity. If you consult the book of Bing’s chronology you will see that the Philco recording schedule followed a strict week after week after week after week recording schedule at the same day and time each week. No doubling up of programs so he could get out of town. I don’t know if he or the network chose the day and time, but it was rigidly consistent for all the seasons of the series.
> 
> Michael Biel.
> 
> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ________________________________
> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com <78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com> on behalf of Rodger J. Holtin <rjh334578 at gmail.com.invalid>
> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 3:45:39 AM
> To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Subject: Re: [78-L] For 78's, What Does Transcription Mean?
> 
> 
> I wasn’t going to argue with Doc Biel, but Bing wanted to record the programs on HIS schedule, not the network’s. The regular weekly thing was interrupting his golf and horse racing life. I’d say you’re right about recording saving the network a bundle of cash. Not to mention the ability to shift time.
> 
> Bing’s guys invented the laugh track, too. (I hated the laughter dubbed into MASH but I suppose it was the only way to make sure people thought it was funny.)
> 
> The Ampex story has been badly bent out of shape, too, but we got it straight for you. Bing recorded it in pieces on disc for the first year of the Philco program and switched to tape the second year. It’s often told that the invention of Ampex afforded him the ability to pre-record. Wrong.
> 
> I think in your query about what we liked about 78s etc that I mentioned Bing as a special figure and it’s true. I own most of his 78s and about half of his LPs and I’ve read everything I could find about him. Sent him a fan letter that was probably on his desk in Holmby Hills when he died in Spain.
> 
> Glad one of the guys sent you Biel’s doctoral dissertation. I wasn’t home or I’d have done it. I keep it on my desktop.
> 
> Rodger Holtin
> 78-L Member Since MCMXCVIII
> 
> For Best Results Use Victor Needles
> 
> Sent from my sluggish old iPhone, which explainz any bad typjng, bad spellimg, nonsensical word choices, delays and all other lapses.
> 
>> On Apr 2, 2020, at 2:00 AM, DKing <ginku_ledovec at att.net.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks, Rodger.  I guess I never really understood the influence that Bing Crosby had.  Not only that, it probably saved the network some money too - as “a show” could be put together anytime, and they wouldn’t have to tie up radio network time to reserve it for a live show.
>> 
>> - Dave King
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 1, 2020, at 8:33 AM, Rodger J. Holtin <rjh334578 at gmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> “War of the Worlds” had no effect on it. Bing Crosby was the major force.
>>> 
>>> During the war Bing made a considerable number of transcriptions for AFRS, especially Command Performance programs. He saw how deftly the engineers could assemble a great sounding program using multiple discs and disc jockeying their way through what sounded like a live performance of a variety show.
>>> 
>>> Bing saw the potential for that because he wanted more control of his own time instead of being locked into showing up at the studio every week at the same time. His network at the time balked at the idea, but the good folks over at the fairly new ABC radio network were willing to play ball with Bing. The Ampex tape recorder came in to play at about that same time thus making the disc transcriptions obsolete, And moving everything to tape.
>>> 
>>> Rodger Holtin
>>> 78-L Member Since MCMXCVIII
>>> 
>>> For Best Results Use Victor Needles
>>> 
>>> Sent from my sluggish old iPhone, which explainz any bad typjng, bad spellimg, nonsensical word choices, delays and all other lapses.
>>> 
>> 
>>>> On Apr 1, 2020, at 8:41 AM, DKing <ginku_ledovec at att.net.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Rodger, that’s interesting that networks required “live” performances, when a good recording could have save them money.
>>>> 
>>>> When it comes to recorded vs. “live” - what changes (if any) were made at the networks after the live broadcast of “War of The World”, which caused so much panic amongst the public?
>>>> 
>>>> - Dave King
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 1, 2020, at 6:14 AM, Rodger J. Holtin <rjh334578 at gmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> “Transcription” was used rather euphemistically by the broadcasters for years. The networks viewed anything that was recorded as second-class sound, especially early on. The Hindenburg disaster helped to crack their general outright ban of recordings.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Small stations, of course, relied heavily on them and on commercial phonograph records. Some artists attempted to thwart that and some labels of the 78 days even said “broadcast prohibited,” to little or no avail. “Electrical Transcriptions” were made just for that purpose and they generally sounded much better than commercial 78s - then and now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Somebody else can probably fill in more details here. There was also a time when anything recorded that was played over the air had to be identified as such so listeners would know that it was not live. I have heard taped programs that were identified as “Transcribed in Chicago..” into the 1960s.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Rodger Holtin
>>>>> 78-L Member Since MCMXCVIII
>>>>> 
>>>>> For Best Results Use Victor Needles
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my sluggish old iPhone, which explainz any bad typjng, bad spellimg, nonsensical word choices, delays and all other lapses.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 1, 2020, at 7:28 AM, DKing <ginku_ledovec at att.net.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks, Kristjan.  You’re right.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Transformation or remake is a more appropriate term
>>>>>> for what Scott Bradlee does with Postmodern Jukebox.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I’m always amazed by how many great singers and musicians
>>>>>> are out there, whether on LP’s or 78’s, and keeping live music
>>>>>> in mind too.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Dave King
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Apr 1, 2020, at 2:40 AM, Kristjan Saag <saag at telia.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Transcription, etymologically, means to write across, over or beyond.
>>>>>>> And, in music, is originally used when scores are involved. Either
>>>>>>> making a score from previously unannotated music or creating a new score
>>>>>>> for a different instrumental setting. Annotated arrangements may be
>>>>>>> labelled as transcriptions as well, but usually take more liberties and,
>>>>>>> if sufficiently different, can be copyrighted.
>>>>>>> I wouldn't use the word transcription for "remakes" in popular music,
>>>>>>> not even for arrangements in jazz music, which usually also give room
>>>>>>> for large proportions of improvisation.
>>>>>>> Scott Bradlee's "transformations" are delicate, especially when Robyn
>>>>>>> Adele Anderson is involved in performing, but let's call them
>>>>>>> "transformations" or "remakes" instead.
>>>>>>> As for the other meaning of the word, when making a recording of a
>>>>>>> broadcast, the type of music, of course, is irrelevant.
>>>>>>> Kristjan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 2020-04-01 06:57, DKing wrote:
>>>>>>>> Thanks David, that makes sense. And it helped seeing your example of
>>>>>>>> musical transcription too. If you approve of the idea of taking one
>>>>>>>> type of music and putting it into a new arrangement for a different
>>>>>>>> style of music, you might like the work of Scott Bradlee’s “Postmodern
>>>>>>>> Jukebox”. For example, take “Boulevard of Broken Dreams”, where Green
>>>>>>>> Day's rock & roll is transformed by Bradlee. Note by Scott Bradlee,
>>>>>>>> who is on the piano: "On our day off on tour we brought Maiya Sykes
>>>>>>>> into the studio, where she delivered this powerful, emotionally raw
>>>>>>>> performance of Green Day's "Boulevard of Broken Dreams" on the very
>>>>>>>> first take. Folks, Maiya Sykes is the real deal, and everyone should
>>>>>>>> know about this incredible vocalist."
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riZck9O-kBU
>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riZck9O-kBU> The comparison is a long
>>>>>>>> way from classical music, so I hope I’m forgiven by Stokowski. - Dave
>>>>>>>> King
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:05 PM, David Lennick
>>>>>>>>> <dplennick at yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: Musically, transcription can
>>>>>>>>> refer to an arrangement such as Bach 'transcribed for orchestra' by
>>>>>>>>> someone like Stokowski. In 78 context it's from the same era of
>>>>>>>>> recorded sound (pre-LP) and is short for 'electrical transcription'
>>>>>>>>> or 'radio transcription', a disc recorded off air or intended for
>>>>>>>>> broadcast in the days before tape. dl ---------- Original Message
>>>>>>>>> ---------- From: DKing <ginku_ledovec at att.net.invalid> Date: March
>>>>>>>>> 31, 2020 at 7:55 PM Many of you recently referred to “transcription”.
>>>>>>>>> What does transcription mean in the context of 78’s, and can it have
>>>>>>>>> more than one meaning? - Dave King
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ 78-L mailing list
>>>>>>>>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>>>>>>>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ 78-L mailing list
>>>>>>>>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>>>>>>>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ 78-L mailing list
>>>>>>>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>>>>>>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> 78-L mailing list
>>>>>>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>>>>>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> 78-L mailing list
>>>>>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>>>>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> 78-L mailing list
>>>>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>>>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 78-L mailing list
>>>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 78-L mailing list
>>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l