[78-L] Triangle 11290

[Malcolm]

Thanks for the plug, Mark.
So now we know where your record did not come from (unless Paramount 
released 20290 twice, which I wouldn't put past them), where did it come 
from? I have been attempting to find out. I believe I have seen LL- 
prefixed matrices in the flow of things discographic but cannot remember 
where or for what record company. Also, Hugh Donovan has been used as a 
pseudonym by Charles Harrison, Arthur Fields as well as Ernest Hare (but 
Harrison is the #1 suspect) for Grey Gull, et al. I have checked 
Emerson, Paramount, Grey Gull and others companies, all to no avail.
I have discovered that "Ben Bolt" was not a common recording and I could 
find no references to either Anita Miller or the tune she recorded, 
either. To be fair,  I did not check Pathe/Perfect, Columbia or Victor 
for recordings of "Ben Bolt".
Anyone else have any success?
Malcolm

*******

On 8/30/2017 6:58 PM, Mark Bardenwerper wrote:
> On 8/30/2017 6:49 PM, Mark Bardenwerper wrote:
>> On 8/30/2017 11:11 AM, David Lewis wrote:
>>> Though it has a big bite taken out of it, I picked up Triangle 11290 for discographical purposes. To wit:
>>>
>>>
>>> Triangle 11290
>>>
>>> A: LL 103-2 Anita Miller: Lullaby from "Ermine"
>>>
>>> B: LL 116-2 Hugh Donovan: Ben Bolt
>>>
>>>
>>> This would likely correspond with Puritan 11290 and Paramount 20290 which would indicate a release late in 1923/early 1924. However, I have not before encountered the "LL" prefix in a Paramount family recording before (it's not "L," as in the Wisconsin Chair-made matrices from 1929 forward.) Anyone know where these sides originated, and a date of recording?
>>>
>>>
>> I find LL 116 a on National Music Lovers 1005 with a different flip,
>> covered also as Puritan 11290 dated 4/?/21
>> Gladys Rice at NML 1002, different coupling, also on Puritan 11290, same
>> date.
>> http://www.78discography.com/NML.htm
>>
> Astute Malcom Rockwell has questioned my Puritan assertion with a set of
> label scans. That makes me and the information I used in error.
>
> http://www.78discography.com/Puritan11000.htm
>
> where, actually, 11290 doe not even occur. That also puts the cross
> reference in the NML discography in error.
>