[78-L] Lousy on 78s- great as reissue

David Lennick dlennick at sympatico.ca.invalid
Tue Apr 12 08:28:42 PDT 2016


Wallerstein would have been the first one to say "We tried long play at Victor and it flopped." And he was, wasn't he?
Victors sound awful after the ban..if they were recording at 33 they must have dubbed to 78 and then kept dubbing from those. I know some classical recordings were being done at 33 (safeties?) after 1945.
dl

> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:23:12 -0500
> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
> From: michael.shoshani at gmail.com.invalid
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Lousy on 78s- great as reissue
> 
> 
> RCA was recording sessions to long playing lacquers by November, 1940; the
> Duke Ellington Centennial box contains aborted takes from the Barney Bigard
> small group session recorded in Chicago on Nov 11, 1940. Whether these were
> used for dubbing masters or simply for reference/safety isn't clear, but
> it's obvious from the sound quality that by the mid-1940s, probably after
> the second AFM ban ended, RCA was dubbing 78 rpm issues from lacquer
> session recordings.
> 
> As for Columbia, I've seen in at least one place (the book "Sessions with
> Sinatra") that Wallerstein had two lacquers made at every session, one for
> dubbing the 78 masters and one to be left untouched as a pristine source
> for long playing records when they were developed. Whether that's true or
> whether it's memory coloration is probably something we won't ever know
> today.
> 
> Aside to dl: Sessions with Sinatra contains oral history (well, written
> now) from some of the engineers who worked on the early 78-to-Lp dubbing
> sessions, and outlines how they worked out their timing. (If you don't have
> access to that particular book, shoot me an email and I'll quote you the
> section.)
> 
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:12 AM, David Lennick <
> dlennick at sympatico.ca.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >
> > In my opinion, both (first question). I think alternate takes were
> > recorded on the same 16" disc because in transferring some sets I found
> > notable differences between sides, with some distinctly lacking in highs.
> > The recordings were made on 16" discs and dubbed to 78RPM using different
> > equalizations at different times and some may have been dubbed from second
> > generation copies of the 16" discs. Whether this was done for convenience
> > or Columbia really anticipated the development of a long playing record in
> > 1940 .. you be the judge. Dubbing meant cleaner source material for when
> > the stampers wore out, which probably happened faster with the lamination
> > process. Other companies also recorded their originals at 33 and dubbed to
> > 78..Decca began doing it in 1943, Capitol maybe around the same time,
> > smaller labels like Asch and the Joe Davis labels (you'll find 3 different
> > transfers of the same recording on Beacon, Gennett and Davis) and Varsity
> > (2 different transfers exist of She Had to Go and Lose It at the Astor).
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
 		 	   		  


More information about the 78-L mailing list