[78-L] Columbia LP "5" prefix ???

[Thomas Stern]

Hi David,
  Thanks!
  Steve Smolian on ARSCLIST confirms this was a code to charge 5.98 instead
of 4.98.  It disappeared after about 1955.
  No one indicated if the Porter Album also appears without the 5 in the ML
series.  Anyone have one???
  Best wishes, Thomas.

-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
[mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of David Lennick
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 9:09 AM
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
Subject: Re: [78-L] Columbia LP "5" prefix ???


I don't know if the 5 was added to albums they wanted to sell for more
(although they had the K for that purpose) or just to keep them from looking
like old releases after 1955. Seems to me the 1951 Prades Festival albums
have ML 5xxxx numbers on grey label 6-eye pressings.

dl

> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com; ARSCLIST at LISTSERV.LOC.GOV
> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:34:32 -0400
> From: sternth at attglobal.net.invalid
> Subject: [78-L] Columbia LP  "5" prefix ???
> 
> 
> I've noticed a number of COLUMBIA LPs which have a
> 
> star with the number "5" on the jacket, near the catalogue number.
> 
> Just noticed an album which actually incorporates the
> 
> 5 in the catalogue number:  the cast album of
> 
> Cole Porter's "OUT OF THIS WORLD"
> 
> issued on 78's as MM-980, on LP as ML-54390, 
> 
> reissued as OL-4390 according to
> 
> an Sondheim online database, and copies at auction/sale sites.
> 
> The CSP reissues use the 4390 number (COL or CML prefix).
> 
>  
> 
> WHAT is the significance of the "5" star on Columbia albums?
> 
> Was the Porter album ever issued as ML-4390 ??
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Best wishes, Thomas.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l