[78-L] ^what archival really means

[David Lennick]

Acid-free might make a difference for lacquers but I wouldn't waste the money 
on shellacs. And in any event, you can wrap your records in deerskin for all I 
care but it's still pointless unless you've cleaned them first.

dl

On 2/9/2015 11:47 AM, Joe Salerno wrote:
>
> I recall once Kurt Nauck posted that he had never seen paper damage a
> shellac record.
>
> I must wonder that a paper label might be damaged, however.
>
> Joe Salerno
>
> On 2/8/2015 4:30 PM, Rodger Holtin wrote:
>
>> Are shellac or vinyl records affected by acidic paper?
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list

On 2/9/2015 11:50 AM, Joe Salerno wrote:
>
> It's all hype anyway. In the video production business, there is a term
> "broadcast quality" which also means nothing, never defined clearly, but
> handy to toss around to sell something to an unsuspecting buyer -
> especially in this day when TV stations will use any footage from any
> source to report news or fill the video space.
>
> Joe Salerno
>
> On 2/8/2015 4:38 PM, David Lennick wrote:
>>
>> Lordy but I hate those crappy photo albums. Now, let's take on "organic".
>>
>> dl
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>