[78-L] experimental Victor electric?

[David Lennick]

Brunswick, OKeh and any labels without access to Western Electric made lousy 
electricals when they first converted. Gennett had so much trouble with the new 
equipment they had to go back to acoustical a few times, and the early Marsh 
stuff is unbelievably rotten. I have no particular affection for Victor 
acousticals...played it too safe. Columbias seemed to have a much fuller sound.

dl

On 2/1/2015 10:29 PM, Rodger Holtin wrote:
>
> Almost agree with your list David, but I've always thought every early electric Victor or Columbia was head and shoulders above any acoustic I ever heard.  The sonic range may not be all the much greater but the fine details of the fainter sounds sure seem to be registered much better; the sibilance of singers or the bite of a fiddle bow, fr'instance.  Just my opinion.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com [mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of DAVID BURNHAM
> Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 12:30 AM
> To: 78-L Mail List
> Subject: Re: [78-L] experimental Victor electric?
>
>
> I think you'll find that almost every step forward in audio technology has been prefaced by a step backwards - the first electrics weren't as good as the best accoustics, the first LPs not as good as the best 78s, the first stereos not as good as the best monos and the first digitals not as good as the best analogs, (especially direct to disc analogs).
> db
>
>
>