[78-L] 78 rpm stylus question

[jsalerno@earthlink.net]

So I wondering if there is a connection between this strange behavior 
and dog whistle. Why would a cooling wax master cause a spike at some 
specific freq? Why not at many freqs or broadband? And does this somehow 
relate to what Christopher is seeing? I echo his question, has anyone 
else ever seen such behavior?

Joe Salerno

On 8/28/2014 2:52 AM, Christopher Steward wrote:
>
> I've found this same effect using a 3 mil stylus for the Shure M75 bought from the Ed Saunders site. On some discs there is just a sharp notch at 15 kHz, and on others it's accompanied by the rise that Joe refers to. Can anybody explain this strange anomaly?
>
> Chris
>
>
> On Wednesday, 27 August 2014, 23:55, "jsalerno at earthlink.net" <jsalerno at earthlink.net.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> The 2.8 TE is producing a notch at about 11.3 KHz. Under the notch is a
> slight increase in amplitude, say apx. 10.8 to 11.1 KHz. The 3.0 does not.
>
> I've never seen anything like this. To my ears it sounds rather like dog
> whistle, but of course it is not.
>
> Joe Salerno
>
> On 8/27/2014 3:41 AM, Christopher Steward wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bryan,
>> I know your post was a long time ago, but for some reason I kept it, and have just looked at a spectrogram of your files. There's a very strange hf glitch in the recordings using your 2.8 mil stylus which I also have recently encountered. If you would like me to send the spectrogram feel free to contact me off-list.
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> On Monday, 7 January 2013, 15:36, Bryan Wright <bryan at claxtonola.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Occasionally when I buy new 78 styli (either from Esoteric Sound or
>> Expert Stylus), I get one that sounds "different." I usually order
>> truncated elliptical styli in sizes ranging from 2.0 mil to 4.0 mil.
>> I'm accustomed to the general "sound" these styli provide, and I know
>> what I should be hearing. However, once in a while I get a new stylus
>> that produces sound with a light constant "hiss" and a greatly pinched
>> frequency range in which the highs seem to be greatly reduced or
>> virtually gone. I've encountered this same general "altered sound" on
>> about one out of every three or four new styli, and it can affect any
>> sized stylus. Rather than try to describe it further, I've posted an
>> audio sample with four brief clips:
>>
>> http://www.bryanswright.com/2013-stylus-test.wav
>>
>> 1. The first 15 seconds is played with a "normal" 3.0mil TE stylus
>> 2. The next 15 seconds is the same record with a stylus as I describe
>> above (in this case, a 2.8mil TE stylus)
>> 3. The next 20-25 seconds is another record with the "normal" 3.0mil
>> TE stylus
>> 4. The final 20-25 seconds is the same record with the "problem"
>> 2.8mil TE stylus
>>
>> I don't have a microscope to examine these two styli carefully to see
>> what might be causing the different sound. Does anyone here know? Is
>> the 2.8mil stylus in the audio excerpt defective? It isn't always
>> "worse" (sometimes, the reduced frequency range is a blessing on
>> really worn records), but in general, I much prefer the sound of the
>> stylus in the first example above. It sounds much more "open" and
>> "natural" to my ears.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bryan W.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>