[78-L] Great Singers "Era" (would be all eras)
rjh334578gmail
rjh334578 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 29 10:40:26 PDT 2014
Certainly some interesting exchanges from some erudite and passionate
fans on all fronts. Glad I posed the question. Thanks to you all for
the insights. Thomas - still with us??
I wonder what the kids are doing over on facebook....
Sent from my iPod - which explainz any bad typjng
On Apr 29, 2014, at 12:01 PM, "Joe Scott" <joenscott at mail.com> wrote:
> Well, as far as instrumentalists go, once Woody Herman's clarinet
> playing was no longer modern enough to impress other jazz musicians
> (about 1947), you couldn't hold your head up in jazz and make
> anything the general public wanted to hear (successfully marketed
> anomalies such as Dave "I Have To Do With College" Brubeck aside).
> So if you were Frank Beecher, formerly with Goodman, you ended up
> playing with Bill Haley. If you were Lee Allen, who'd dreamed of
> soloing in Lunceford's band, you ended up playing with Little Richard.
>
> The public didn't want to hear Benny Goodman just improvise through
> a whole record any more -- but never really had, either, had wanted
> him with Helen Forrest or Peggy Lee or the like, mostly. The public
> knew Jimmy Rushing as "Mr. Five By Five" much better than they knew
> Lester Young as "Pres." The Big Band or Swing Era was a singers' era.
>
> Joseph Scott
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Malcolm Rockwell
> Sent: 04/29/14 10:37 AM
> To: 78-L Mail List
> Subject: Re: [78-L] the end of the Great Singers Era
>
> Could it be that people began trying too hard to be Great Singers,
> instead of actually being great singers? There is a certain level of
> phoniness to be dealt with here. For example it's possible Judy
> Garland was a person who ended up believing her own press releases.
> And Billie Holiday was not. Also I feel the public got lost in the
> (melodic and harmonic) complexity that jazz became and that is why
> it dwindled. Same happened with Hawaiian steel guitar playing.
> Taking a simple, grinnable concept and turning it into a no-grin
> situation. The inverse happened with the ukulele. It was born simple
> and stayed that way. And it's still popular. Malcolm ******* On
> 4/29/2014 5:24 AM, Joe Scott wrote: > "I think that from about 1945,
> there were fewer and fewer tunes that lent themselves to jazz
> interpretation. I'm not saying that was a good or a bad thing, just
> a statement of fact." > I don't think it's really more difficult for
> a person to make jazz out of "Raindrops Are Falling On My H
> ead" than out of "Ol' Man River," I think the general public lost
> interest in jazz interpretations of the latest hits because they'd
> lost interest in jazz. > Joseph Scott >
> _______________________________________________ > 78-L mailing list
> > 78-L at klickitat.78online.com > http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> > _______________________________________________ 78-L mailing list 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
More information about the 78-L
mailing list