[78-L] Caruso with wrong label

DAVID BURNHAM burnhamd at rogers.com
Wed Sep 18 07:24:21 PDT 2013

And although it didn't involve an acoustic/electrical crossover, both versions of Ernest Lough's "Hear My Prayer" have identical HMV labels, (in fact I wasn't even aware that there were two versions until I ran into Ernest Lough in the Temple Church in 1977).  The two versions are easy to distinguish, (once you know about them), because the first release was take III on both sides and the later release was take VI on side one and take VIII on side two.  I assume the take sequence was just continued when they re-recorded it so that both sides would have begun with take IV.  The North American Victor release was only the first take III version, (I guess the record wasn't as popular here as it was in England).


> From: Iñigo Cubillo <ice261263 at gmail.com>
>To: 78-l <78-l at klickitat.78online.com> 
>Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:12:32 AM
>Subject: Re: [78-L] Caruso with wrong label
>Only a reminder...
>A bit logic + a bit observation of sister company HMV proceeds... make
>one suppose that Victrola reissues of old low numbered batwings with
>new Ortho labels are surely not so rare.
>Victrolas that were popular enough (like Carusos, Heifertzs or
>Kreislers, Galli-Curcis, Rachmaninoffs...) when no electrical
>re-recording was made, reissues of old acoustics were made with Ortho
>labels. Even sometimes the acoustic repressings coexisted with the new
>electricals (high takes of the same matrix no.). At least in HMV it
>happened with some records. I own two 1928 pressings of Amelita's "Una
>voce"; one is the acoustical DB-261 and the other is the electrical
>DB-1355 , and both are 1928 pressings with the proper (same) HMV label
>styles. It could well have happened with Victrolas.. Didn't it?
>78-L mailing list
>78-L at klickitat.78online.com

More information about the 78-L mailing list