[78-L] Early RCA Tonearm

George Epple gkepple at msn.com
Sun Jun 23 07:00:10 PDT 2013


Hello all... I have been told that the wide RCA tonearms were designed to extend frequency response and in fact do. These RE series sets, when properly restored have great fedelity!

George

From: 78-l-request at klickitat.78online.com
Subject: 78-L Digest, Vol 57, Issue 24
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:00:01 -0700

Send 78-L mailing list submissions to
	78-l at klickitat.78online.com
 
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	78-l-request at klickitat.78online.com
 
You can reach the person managing the list at
	78-l-owner at klickitat.78online.com
 
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of 78-L digest..."
--Forwarded Message Attachment--From: kil at roadrunner.com
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:24:39 -0400
Subject: Re: [78-L] Marterie Query

I also found Johnny Bibb on at least one session in 1952.  But BONGO GUITAR 
was recorded in November 1954, so Tedesco is your best bet so far.
RayK
>
From: Dan Van Landingham
After doing some quick checking,Al Caiola worked with him in 1949 when 
Marterie first joined Mercury.Then in 1953,Tommy Tedesco appeared on his 
records in 1953-54.
>>
From: David Lewis
Some may call it the squariest of square interest areas, but my interest in 
Ralph Marterie began long ago with "Crazy Man Crazy" and his unsung
(and unlikely) role as a rock n roll pioneer. However it has stepped up a 
bit lately as my friend the singer Bill Walters toured with Marterie and 
sang
on several of Marterie's Mercury singles. So I've been picking them up --  
they are quite common both as 78s and 45s. And I must say I am enjoying
some of these instrumentals he recorded.
 
Does anyone know who the guitarist might be on "Bongo Guitar" (Mer 
70482/70482x45)?
 
 
 
--Forwarded Message Attachment--From: dlennick at sympatico.ca
To: 78-L at 78online.com
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:23:09 -0400
Subject: [78-L] Got one of these in your attic?

http://santafe.craigslist.org/clt/3858202243.html
 
dl
 
--Forwarded Message Attachment--From: lherault at bu.edu
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:21:16 -0400
Subject: Re: [78-L] Got one of these in your attic?

Dang it.  I've got the cheaper 1930 model without recording capability.
I've had the pick up rebuilt and the whole thing sounds nice.
 
Ron L
 
-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
[mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of David Lennick
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 10:23 PM
To: 78L
Subject: [78-L] Got one of these in your attic?
 
http://santafe.craigslist.org/clt/3858202243.html
 
dl
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
 
 
--Forwarded Message Attachment--From: david_breneman at yahoo.com
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com; 78-L at 78online.com
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:45:38 -0700
Subject: Re: [78-L] Got one of these in your attic?

 From: David Lennick <dlennick at sympatico.ca>
 
 
> http://santafe.craigslist.org/clt/3858202243.html
 
Can anyone explain why the early RCA electric tonearms had
those huge metal "shoulders" behind the pickup?  Was it
to trip some record changer mechanism only installed in
some models or...  ...What?!
 
--Forwarded Message Attachment--From: david_breneman at yahoo.com
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com; 78-L at 78online.com
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:45:38 -0700
Subject: Re: [78-L] Got one of these in your attic?

 From: David Lennick <dlennick at sympatico.ca>
 
 
> http://santafe.craigslist.org/clt/3858202243.html
 
Can anyone explain why the early RCA electric tonearms had
those huge metal "shoulders" behind the pickup?  Was it
to trip some record changer mechanism only installed in
some models or...  ...What?!
 
--Forwarded Message Attachment--From: lherault at bu.edu
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:15:58 -0400
Subject: Re: [78-L] Got one of these in your attic?

It's a counterweight, not enough of one in some respects but that's what it
is.  I have an additional slip on weight that I believe was part of a "kit"
sold to reduce wear on the Victor "LPs" that were introduced in the early
30s.  I have a second one that slips on the end of the straight tone arm
that has an inverted U cross section too.  They have felt linings the same
color as Victor turn table felt.  
 
Ron L
 
-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
[mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of David Breneman
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 12:46 AM
To: 78-L Mail List; 78L
Subject: Re: [78-L] Got one of these in your attic?
 
 From: David Lennick <dlennick at sympatico.ca>
 
 
> http://santafe.craigslist.org/clt/3858202243.html
 
Can anyone explain why the early RCA electric tonearms had those huge metal
"shoulders" behind the pickup?  Was it to trip some record changer mechanism
only installed in some models or...  ...What?!
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
 
 
--Forwarded Message Attachment--From: malcolm at 78data.com
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 06:51:44 -1000
Subject: [78-L] odd mx on Varsity

Never seen a Varsity matrix number like this. I've seen C- and US- 
prefixes and Gennett matrices, of course, but never a two digit one.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Hylton-Sisters-Varsity-8071-/251288140501?pt=Music_on_Vinyl&hash=item3a81f0bad5
Odd.
Malcolm
 
--Forwarded Message Attachment--From: dlennick at sympatico.ca
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:57:03 -0400
Subject: Re: [78-L] odd mx on Varsity

I've seen a few, like Johnny Messner's "She Had to Go and Lose It at the Astor" 
(which I've also had in two distinct cuttings, pitched a half tone apart, so 
obviously dubbed from a 33rpm original). I think the label showed 2-digit 
numbers but the dead wax had US xxxx numbers with the 2-digit # as part of it.
 
dl
 
On 6/22/2013 12:51 PM, Malcolm Rockwell wrote:
> Never seen a Varsity matrix number like this. I've seen C- and US-
> prefixes and Gennett matrices, of course, but never a two digit one.
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Hylton-Sisters-Varsity-8071-/251288140501?pt=Music_on_Vinyl&hash=item3a81f0bad5
> Odd.
> Malcolm
> _________________________
 
--Forwarded Message Attachment--From: david.diehl at hensteeth.com
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:11:37 +0000
Subject: Re: [78-L] odd mx on Varsity

Before Oberstein's own studios were ready he recorded at Muzak/Associated and those mxs were numbered 1 (Jess Stacy) thru 81 (Bill Bender).
 DJD
Visit the Blue Pages: the Encyclopedic Guide to 78 RPM Party Records
http://www.hensteeth.com
-----Original Message-----
From: David Lennick [mailto:dlennick at sympatico.ca]
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 11:57 AM
To: '78-L Mail List'
Subject: Re: [78-L] odd mx on Varsity
 
I've seen a few, like Johnny Messner's "She Had to Go and Lose It at the Astor" (which I've also had in two distinct cuttings, pitched a half tone apart, so obviously dubbed from a 33rpm original). I think the label showed 2-digit numbers but the dead wax had US xxxx numbers with the 2-digit # as part of it.dlOn 6/22/2013 12:51 PM, Malcolm Rockwell wrote:> Never seen a Varsity matrix number like this. I've seen C- and US-> prefixes and Gennett matrices, of course, but never a two digit one.> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Hylton-Sisters-Varsity-8071-/251288140501?pt=Music_on_Vinyl&hash=item3a81f0bad5> Odd.> Malcolm> ________________________________________________________________________78-L mailing list78-L at klickitat.78online.comhttp://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
 
--Forwarded Message Attachment--From: malcolm at 78data.com
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 07:15:52 -1000
Subject: Re: [78-L] odd mx on Varsity

Ah-HA!
Thanks, David.
Mal
 
*******
 
On 6/22/2013 7:11 AM, david.diehl at hensteeth.com wrote:
> Before Oberstein's own studios were ready he recorded at Muzak/Associated and those mxs were numbered 1 (Jess Stacy) thru 81 (Bill Bender).
>   DJD
> Visit the Blue Pages: the Encyclopedic Guide to 78 RPM Party Records
> http://www.hensteeth.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Lennick [mailto:dlennick at sympatico.ca]
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 11:57 AM
> To: '78-L Mail List'
> Subject: Re: [78-L] odd mx on Varsity
>
> I've seen a few, like Johnny Messner's "She Had to Go and Lose It at the Astor" (which I've also had in two distinct cuttings, pitched a half tone apart, so obviously dubbed from a 33rpm original). I think the label showed 2-digit numbers but the dead wax had US xxxx numbers with the 2-digit # as part of it.dlOn 6/22/2013 12:51 PM, Malcolm Rockwell wrote:> Never seen a Varsity matrix number like this. I've seen C- and US-> prefixes and Gennett matrices, of course, but never a two digit one.> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Hylton-Sisters-Varsity-8071-/251288140501?pt=Music_on_Vinyl&hash=item3a81f0bad5> Odd.> Malcolm> _______________________________________________________________________
 
 
 		 	   		  


More information about the 78-L mailing list