[78-L] 1912 Ad Offering Columbia 'Eclipse' with Free Double-Sided Demo Record

[David Lennick]

I'm assuming you mean the Special Record (Yeast Foamers March)..only seen one 
version of that.

Sometimes entire programs were done with Canadian versions, like Frank Crumit's 
"Comedy Stars of Broadway" on World Transcriptions. Specially worded Canadian 
commercials are overdubbed by Mr. Frank Gallop.

dl

On 12/9/2012 4:58 PM, Rjholtin wrote:
> Ok I won't ask but YOU brought it up!
>
> Was there a Canadian version of the Yeast Foamers record as well, mentioning that real brand name beer was still available up there?
>
> Sent from my iPod
>
> On Dec 9, 2012, at 3:52 PM, David Lennick<dlennick at sympatico.ca>  wrote:
>
> By the way, the one with the large label also exists in a Canadian version,
> stressing that it was made in Canada by CANADIAN workers. Don't ask me to find
> it..!
>
> dl
>
> On 12/9/2012 4:30 PM, Michael Biel wrote:
> If we follow what the special sleeve that the "Good Night Little Girl
> Good Night" record came in, these two Columbia Double Disc records had
> different NAMES inside the company.  The record with the regular sized
> labels on both sides is the earlier one which is called "Demonstration
> Record", and is even titled that on the label.  The later one with the
> extra-large label on the rear side is the "Sample Record" even though
> the word "demonstrates" is included in the script. Note that the script
> starts by saying "The other side of this sample record . . .".
>
> That special sleeve says: "This record is a sample (not our old
> 'demonstration Record.')  The only reason why the price is set at 25
> cents is because we want you to know first hand about the superior and
> guaranteed quality of Columbia double-disc records and that they will
> play on your machine.  Disc records are interchangeable." It also says
> "One side of this sample record is a tenor solo by Henry Burr --..." and
> "The other side of this sample record carries a short message and a
> little music which you will find entertaining and instructive."  There
> is a printing code at the lower right which is Adv 315-4-15 .
>
> I don't think this Sept 14, 1912 Sat Evening Post ad is claiming that
> the demonstration record they are providing is a NEW item.  It could
> have come out earlier.  Plus, it would be the free Demonstration Record,
> which the book thinks came out in 1910. It would not be the later Sample
> record which was SOLD, not given away.
>
> There is a possibility that the printing code is an April 1915 date. I
> haven't done an analysis yet on Columbia sleeves, the issue dates of
> records on the sleeves, nor the issue dates of the records listed on the
> large label.  Nor have I gone thru all of the trade press to see if
> these demo and sample records are mentioned.  As for why it might have
> been out so far later than 1908 intro date of 2 sided records, this one
> stresses the quality of the recording and of the durability of the disc,
> barely mentioning that it is two sided.  They were especially eager to
> sell this 25 cent record to owners of Victor machines AND the other
> machines starting to come out.  It is the earlier one which stresses it
> being a two sided record.
>
> But I can say that Columbia announced the Double Disc record to dealers
> on Sept 15, 1908, and that the same trade journal had EARLIER opined
> that there were several British companies selling two-sided records, but
> no American two sided records were available other than Fonotipia.
> Zonophone and Star possibly hit the market before Columbia, and
> definitely before Victor which was still announcing new single-sided
> popular releases in early 1909. The lateness of Victor entering the 2
> sided market might be the reason for the Demonstration Record, and its
> pushing of it being two sided.
>
> Mike Biel  mbiel at mbiel.com
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Rjholtin<rjh334578 at yahoo.com>
> Note The Notes by Sherman&   Nauck pg 50 says the disc was issued in 1910 and
> the slipside, Columbia Qt of Kentucky Babe was recorded November 10, 1910 so
> in September of 1912 it was less than a year old.
> Same book pg 26 says first Double Disc appeared in "autumn of 1908" - hence the common confusion.
> Same book again says the other double disc demo appeared in 1913, I always
> assed it was older because the Henry Burr on the flip seems to have been made
> in 1906. Anybody know who the narrator is on this one? Albert Campbell is on the 1910 disc.
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2012, at 9:41 AM, Glenn Longwell<glongwell at snet.net>   wrote:
> This is interesting as it's 4 years since they came out with a double sided record
> and they were still offering this disc. I wonder if they had been offering it all
> along or decided to unload some stock that had been sitting in the warehouse.  Glenn
>
>
> From: Clifford Bolling<78records at cdbpdx.com>
> Here is an interesting ad from the Sep 14, 1912 'Saturday Evening Post'
> introducing the Columbia 'Eclipse'model turntable with a free demonstration
> record if purchased within thirty days from date of publication.
> http://pdx78s.cdbpdx.com/CETT/CETTAD.html       Enjoy! CDB
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>