[78-L] for Grey Gull history fans

Royal Pemberton ampex354 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 22 23:50:09 PST 2012


What did they have for electric recording equipment, I wonder?  Similar to
the mystery equipment Paramount had?  As bad as anything not known to be
recorded with Western Electric equipment is known to often be, who else was
making (and perhaps selling as opposed to leasing) recording equipment in
the mid/late 1920s?  And where is there any information on it (and pix,
etc.)?

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Michael Biel <mbiel at mbiel.com> wrote:

> On 11/21/2012 4:57 PM, David Lennick wrote:
> >> Likewise..some sound quite decent, if over-modulated.
> From: Donna Halper <dlh at donnahalper.com>
> > So is it just their subsidiary labels that gave them such a bad name?
> > I've heard many GG jokes over the years from collectors.
>
> The early GGs with the blue and yellow labels were pressed o pretty good
> shellac, but as the years went by and especially for the subsidiary
> labels, the shellac can be so soft that you can easily make a groove in
> the blank areas with your fingernail.  I have a hilarious late Van Dyke
> "Over the radio Waves" by a wobbly male and female duo that is
> completely distorted with overmodulation, and seems to have been worn
> out in perhaps five playings.
>
> Mike Biel  mbiel at mbiel.com
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>


More information about the 78-L mailing list