[78-L] Victor scrolls

[Michael Biel]

On 4/6/2012 2:02 PM, David Lennick wrote:
> Presumably..for many, that was how we first heard it. Certainly all Canadian
> pressings from 1941 till a dubbed master went into use around 1947 are the
> split version.
>
> dl

I have a US pressing but it has a weird set of breaks in the label 
rings, which were the denotations of the pressing plant.  I've been 
wondering if this might have denoted a Canadian pressing plant for the 
U.S. market because I don't think I have seen that sequence of breaks 
before.  I don't have it handy to describe where they are.  Maybe 
someone else has it and can tell us.  We would also need to know if the 
rings are close to or slightly away from the meatball logo at the bottom.

Mike Biel  mbiel at mbiel.com
>
> On 4/6/2012 1:52 PM, David Weiner wrote:
>> Uhhh, what? Huh? Do you mean the incorrectly coupled reissue with one side
>> from 1924 and the other from 1927?   Dave Weiner
>>
>> On 4/6/12 1:26 PM, "David Lennick"<dlennick at sympatico.ca>   wrote:
>>
>>> Nyuk nyuk nyuk.   dl
>>>
>>> On 4/6/2012 1:14 PM, Dave Burnham wrote:
>>>> I was always impressed that the move to electrical recording occurred
>>>> when Victor was in the middle of recording Rhapsody in Blue, so that one
>>>> side was acoustic and the other was electrical.   db
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> _