[78-L] Old Geezers

David Lennick dlennick at sympatico.ca
Fri Mar 23 19:40:54 PDT 2012


Didn't they advise using an OLD needle to play flexible discs like Filmophone 
and the like? And by the way, those are extremely difficult to play on modern 
equipment.

dl

On 3/23/2012 9:37 PM, Ron L'Herault wrote:
> Records contained abrasives that were there to wear steel needles into the
> best shape to follow the groove on that record.  That is why one should
> change the needle after each play.  Whether you use loud tone, medium or
> soft tone on an acoustical record is more a matter of personal taste.  If
> you are playing an electrically recorded record on an acoustical
> (non-Orthophonic/Vivatonal/Panatrope), a practice you should avoid, at least
> use a soft tone needle to minimize wear to the grooves.   Your playback
> machine should have a rebuilt reproducer with the right gaskets so that
> compliance will be at its best.  The arm should move freely both laterally
> and up and down.  A friend of mine is adamant that one should only use
> medium tone needles to play back Orthophonic era records.
>
> I believe that as pick-ups became lighter and needles became
> "semi-permanent" the abrasive content was lowered so later records would
> best be played with lighter pick-ups such as the early crystals or the GE
> RPX and VR.   Since even a very light cartridge will produce some wear,
> extremely rare/valuable and/or well loved/often played records will last
> longer when played with a modern pick up and the proper sized stylus.   The
> grit in an old record will affect a modern stylus, but more so the sapphires
> than the diamonds.
>
> Ron L  (a phonograph collector who amasses records.)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
> [mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Balcerak
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:48 PM
> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Old Geezers
>
> I'm 25, and definitely a lurker.  I am full of "stupid questions" but I
> usually try to get them answered elsewhere before I bother this esteemed
> body.
>
> On that note, I have one for you all.  I have not discovered a definitive
> answer about steel needles.  I have a variety of different gramophone, and
> of course a modern turntable.  I've read: acoustic recordings sound better
> with medium tone needles, electric recordings with soft tone, and if you
> want you can mix and match for loudness however you want.  Using that as a
> rule of thumb has been great for all my early records.  However, when do I
> have to stop using steel needles and only use an electric pickup?  Thus far,
> if the record hasn't been orthophonic (or one of their breed) or before,
> I've kept it off a gramophone.  Everything afterword, I've used a modern
> turntable.  I know they produced gramophones well into the forties, and in
> some countries into the sixties.  Does this mean I can throw my later
> Chinese records onto a gramophone and be OK?
>
> Also, is it different for different labels?  Do bluebirds handle better on
> gramophones than okehs?  I have read that records have a grinding agent in
> the opening grooves to make the steel needles ideal for the individual
> record.  When did they stop doing this?  Will this grinding agent effect a
> modern turntable stylus?
>
> Essentially, with at least fifty years of play time ahead of me, I don't
> want to leave my grand kids with a bunch of old coasters.
> ______________________________________________


More information about the 78-L mailing list