[78-L] Original 78 rpm info? TOMMY DORSEY: DEDICATED TO YOU (RCA/Camden) 1964 Vinyl LP

[Robert M. Bratcher Jr.]

Your right Mike, I don't like any kind of electronic (fake) stereo as it all sounds awful in every case. Other than that the LP transfer is nice but the original 78's will be much better even with the surface noise which doesn't bother me a bit. And yes if I had to choose between any 78 transfer on LP no matter how good or bad it was & a 78 rpm original record then guess what? I'll take the 78 (if I can find one) every time!!



>________________________________
>From: Michael Biel <mbiel at mbiel.com>
>To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2011 10:15 AM
>Subject: Re: [78-L] Original 78 rpm info? TOMMY DORSEY: DEDICATED TO YOU (RCA/Camden) 1964 Vinyl LP
>
>On 11/8/2011 6:30 AM, Robert M. Bratcher Jr. wrote:
>>> ...so I might as well go dig up the original 78's from it. Have done the
>>> same thing with other 78 rpm era LP compilation sets where I'd track down
>>> the original 78's of songs I like on the LP. Nothing wrong with that!!
>
>> Nothing wrong? If you like the sound of the original 78 more, depending 
>> on how honest the LP transfer was, you may like the 78 more! Something 
>> done right    joe salerno
>
>The posting mentioned that his LP was a Camden Electronic Stereo copy. 
>You can't get an LP transfer MORE dishonest than that!!!  These 78s seem
>early enough that they are probably not dubs themselves like many
>mid-40s and later Victor 78s.
>
>Mike Biel  mbiel at mbiel.com
>
>