[78-L] Victor 24145 ETHEL MERMAN 1932 SATAN'S LI'L LAMB

[Bud Black]

For that matter, 1932 itself was not terrifically common.

Bud

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 21, 2011, at 6:30 PM, "J. E. Knox" <rojoknox at metroeast.org> wrote:

> Greetings from FixitLand!
> 
> Erwin Kluwer wrote:
> 
>> Who the [bleep] wants to pay anything for Ethel Merman..???!!!!
> 
> For me, the attraction was that it's Victor 24145, not so much who's  
> on it. 1932 Victors aren't terrifically common. For that matter, 1932  
> records in general aren't terrifically common.
> 
> Take care,
> 
> 
> Joe
> --
> "Watch your kitten make a snug home for itself in a shoe box. Two  
> weeks later, we see the outrage on his face. 'This shoe box has  
> shrunk! I am being forced to live in an unfair world!'"--Christine  
> Harris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l