No subject

can see in an illustration in my copy of a January 1942=0A> General Records=
 Catalogue of the Jelly Roll's On album, the mysterious=0A> word is "invent=
ed" printed in italics for emphasis. Despite the copy=0A> on the front of t=
he album cover, this was a new low-cost three-record=0A> package that sold =
for $1.75. =0A=0AFrom the looks of the picture and what you now say, this m=
ight not be a=0Abook album but an envelope set.=0A=0AMike Biel  mbiel at mbiel=
.com =0A=0A> There were three other albums issued in this price range. This=
 is NOT=0A> the same thing as the "New Orleans Memories" album that was ori=
ginally=0A> issued at a retail price of $5.50. In the January 1942 Catalogu=
e, the=0A> price was lowered to $4.50. From General, the Morton records wen=
t over=0A> to Commodore, which issued them in their regular series.   Geoff=
rey=0A=0A=0A=0AOn 11/28/2011 5:58 PM, Mike Daley wrote:=0A> looks like "inv=
ented" in puffed-up letters to me.=0A>=0A> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:29 PM,=
 David Lennick<dlennick at sympatico.ca> wrote:=0A>> Can anybody figure what t=
he second-last word is in the description below the=0A>> title? I think it'=
s "invented"..what say you?=0A>>=0A>> dl=0A>>=0A>> On 11/28/2011 5:21 PM, C=
ary Ginell wrote:=0A>>>=0A>>> Initially, I thought the apostrophe was misus=
ed, but in looking at it, the apostrophe makes the title a nasty little pun=
. Nice job, General.=0A>>>=0A>>> Cary Ginell=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>> Date: Mon, =
28 Nov 2011 17:19:59 -0500=0A>>>> From: dlennick at sympatico.ca=0A>>>> To: 78=
-L at 78online.com=0A>>>> Subject: [78-L] I just love great album art=0A>>>>=
=0A>>>> http://www.popsike.com/pix/20110909/320757018122.jpg=0A>>>>=0A>>>> =
dl=0A