[78-L] Back Beat Boogie

[David Lennick]

35456, per Rust.

dl

On 9/30/2011 4:39 PM, Ray Kilcoyne wrote:
> According to Ty's discography it is Columbia 35456, recorded on 11/30/39.
> Is this not correct?
> RayK
>>
> If your pressing is non-laminated, it could be an original (but don't crack
> it
> to find out..it's a great record).
>
> dl
>
> On 9/30/2011 2:52 PM, Matthew Duncan wrote:
>> a very, very close relative to 50s R&R in my opinion...and a superb
>> record..
>>
>> Matthew.
>>
>> --- On Fri, 30/9/11, agp<agp2176 at verizon.net>   wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: agp<agp2176 at verizon.net>
>> Subject: Re: [78-L] Back Beat Boogie
>> To: "78-L Mail List"<78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>> Date: Friday, 30 September, 2011, 18:49
>>
>>
>> At 18:20 30/09/2011, JEK wrote:
>>> Columbia 35356 is indeed the first issue of "Back Beat Boogie." All
>>> copies are denoted "Jazz Masterwork" -- Columbia's response to
>>> Victor's "Swing Classic" issues. If your copy has the words "Trade
>>> Mark" below the CBS microphone/Magic Notes trademark, it's an early
>>> pressing (at least no later than Summer 1941).
>>
>> It doesn't so it must be a later pressing.
>>
>> Am I totally off base in seeing it as a close relative to rock'n'roll?
>>
>> T
>>
>>
>