[78-L] Back Beat Boogie

[Ray Kilcoyne]

According to Ty's discography it is Columbia 35456, recorded on 11/30/39. 
Is this not correct?
RayK
>
If your pressing is non-laminated, it could be an original (but don't crack 
it
to find out..it's a great record).

dl

On 9/30/2011 2:52 PM, Matthew Duncan wrote:
> a very, very close relative to 50s R&R in my opinion...and a superb 
> record..
>
> Matthew.
>
> --- On Fri, 30/9/11, agp<agp2176 at verizon.net>  wrote:
>
>
> From: agp<agp2176 at verizon.net>
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Back Beat Boogie
> To: "78-L Mail List"<78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Date: Friday, 30 September, 2011, 18:49
>
>
> At 18:20 30/09/2011, JEK wrote:
>> Columbia 35356 is indeed the first issue of "Back Beat Boogie." All
>> copies are denoted "Jazz Masterwork" -- Columbia's response to
>> Victor's "Swing Classic" issues. If your copy has the words "Trade
>> Mark" below the CBS microphone/Magic Notes trademark, it's an early
>> pressing (at least no later than Summer 1941).
>
> It doesn't so it must be a later pressing.
>
> Am I totally off base in seeing it as a close relative to rock'n'roll?
>
> T
>
>

_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l