[78-L] The Lost Chord was Re: Obscene Jim Reeves record

[David Lennick]

Go back to the first message in the thread if you can find it. Someone posted a 
Jim Reeves promo disc with a ludicrous price ($21 million smackeroonies) and 
Cary, I think it was, mentioned it as obscene, meaning the price, not the record.

dl

On 4/19/2011 9:14 PM, Dan Van Landingham wrote:
> I'm missing something here.What does the "Lost Chord" have to do with an
> "obscene Jim Reeves"
> recording?I had some of his Abbott and RCA sides but this "obscene recording" is
> new to me.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Steven C. Barr<stevenc at interlinks.net>
> To: 78-L Mail List<78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Sent: Sun, April 17, 2011 6:11:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [78-L] The Lost Chord was Re: Obscene Jim Reeves record
>
> From: "Steve Shapiro"<steveshapiro1 at juno.com>
>>
>> This is even more than I am prepared to pay for the Lost Chord.  Not the
>> song, just the chord itself.  Once I find it, I'll copyright it and
>> license it for the next 17 years./steve
>>
> Interesting point here...! Could someone copyright a chord...or a note...
> and then claim that anyone else who subsequently recorded
> that same chord/note was infringing their copyright and thereby
> owed them royalties?
>
> Steven C. Barr
>