[78-L] The Lost Chord was Re: Obscene Jim Reeves record

Dan Van Landingham danvanlandingham at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 19 18:14:34 PDT 2011


I'm missing something here.What does the "Lost Chord" have to do with an 
"obscene Jim Reeves"
recording?I had some of his Abbott and RCA sides but this "obscene recording" is 
new to me.




________________________________
From: Steven C. Barr <stevenc at interlinks.net>
To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Sun, April 17, 2011 6:11:39 PM
Subject: Re: [78-L] The Lost Chord was Re: Obscene Jim Reeves record

From: "Steve Shapiro" <steveshapiro1 at juno.com>
>
> This is even more than I am prepared to pay for the Lost Chord.  Not the 
> song, just the chord itself.  Once I find it, I'll copyright it and 
> license it for the next 17 years./steve
>
Interesting point here...! Could someone copyright a chord...or a note...
and then claim that anyone else who subsequently recorded
that same chord/note was infringing their copyright and thereby
owed them royalties?

Steven C. Barr 

_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l


More information about the 78-L mailing list