[78-L] Millionaire's Messiah
Philip Carli
Philip_Carli at pittsford.monroe.edu
Mon Feb 14 08:30:16 PST 2011
Speaking of brain slips, oops. I mentally inserted "less" before reading "well-informed" in your note. Irony appreciated, brain scattered here...sorry. PC
________________________________________
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com [78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Philip Carli [Philip_Carli at pittsford.monroe.edu]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 11:29 AM
To: 78-L Mail List
Subject: Re: [78-L] Millionaire's Messiah
Thanks, David. Even in that well-informed article, however, the author writes "Vitrolac" (without the internal "c") in paragraph 3, despite the clearly readble "Victrolac" right there in his sleeve photo. It might be one of those brain-slip words that you have to force your memory to spell correctly. PC
________________________________________
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com [78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of David Lennick [dlennick at sympatico.ca]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 11:17 AM
To: 78-L Mail List
Subject: Re: [78-L] Millionaire's Messiah
It's definitely Victrolac, but I'm not sure where the other spelling
originated. Probably in well-informed articles such as this:
http://tenwatts.blogspot.com/2006/05/transcription-disc.html
Hey, I didn't know RCA was making the stuff in 1929. Live and learn. And that
we've been calling AFRN by the wrong name, AFRS, all these years.
dl
On 2/14/2011 11:05 AM, Philip Carli wrote:
> This may sound naive, but what is the correct spelling -- "Vitrolac" or "Victrolac" (with the internal "c")? I've seen it both ways and am personally inclined towards the latter (it makes more sense to me), but just want to get it absolutely correct. PC
> ________________________________________
> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com [78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of David Lennick [dlennick at sympatico.ca]
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 9:26 AM
> To: 78-L Mail List
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Millionaire's Messiah
>
> Could be the original pressing of Gurrelieder..I don't know how long it was
> kept in print on Victrolac. I have a z-material pressing of it. I'd have to
> check to see if it's still on Scroll or on circle label.
>
> dl
>
> On 2/14/2011 1:53 AM, S&R Pinsker wrote:
>>
>> Columbia OP Set 10-a/10-B is indeed Manon; small blue on silver labels pasted on the spines.
>> The only 78 Messiah In my "vault" is Beecham's in Victor albums M1194/50.
>> The Gurrelieder discs are Dynaflex thin and slightly flexible, so I suppose that's Victrolac.
>> Do I have something valuable for a change?
>> rdp
>>
> _________________
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
This email message and any attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from using the information in any way, including but not limited to disclosure of, copying, forwarding or acting in reliance on the contents. If you have received this email by error, please immediately notify me by return email and delete it from your email system. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
More information about the 78-L
mailing list