[78-L] Best used turntable types for cleaning?
Malcolm Rockwell
malcolm at 78data.com
Thu Feb 3 08:24:38 PST 2011
Hmmm... just a wild guess here but wouldn't one of the the reasons that
cleaning turntables are expensive be because they're WATERPROOF???
Putting water & soap on a direct drive table doesn't sound like my idea
of fun. But what Jeff says is right - it's torque you need not speed.
How about using an old Rek-O-Kut 16" cutting lathe table running at
33rpm, bearings & gears greased to the max, mounted on a piece of thick
plastic with a belt drive (like a large auto fan belt!) to a motor
that's well away from the action?
Mal
*******
On 2/3/2011 1:22 AM, tions wrote:
> I presume the 78 indicates old technology. Maybe I can find a direct drive platter on Ebay because record cleaning turntables seem expensive.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jeff Lichtman
> To: 78-L Mail List
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 12:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Best used turntable types for cleaning?
>
>
>
> >I'm looking for a used turntable for spinning records for cleaning purposes.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >R.K.
>
> A few thoughts: I assume you will use this turntable only for
> cleaning (i.e. not for playing). What you need is torque, not speed.
> So don't worry about whether the turntable has a 78 speed - you won't need it.
>
> The platter has to keep turning even while you're pressing down on
> the record surface with a cleaning brush. As such, I'd stay away from
> a belt drive turntable, as the belt can slip. Direct drive is
> probably best for torque. An idler-wheel turntable would probably be cheapest.
>
> Have you considered buying a record cleaning machine? Most of these
> do vacuum removal of the cleaning fluid, which saves a lot of time
> and gives better results (in my opinion).
>
> - Jeff Lichtman
> jeff at swazoo.com
> Check out Swazoo Koolak's Web Jukebox at
> http://swazoo.com/
>
More information about the 78-L
mailing list