[78-L] Who says some phono collectors aren't creepy?

[David Lennick]

Sounds like Prokofiev's Romeo and Juliet, or one of his other equally 
depressing ballet scores. Much wow in the vintage audio, so maybe it's from the 
old USSR set. As for the phonograph, is it possible the image has been flipped? 
(Ooh,,maybe this was a soundie, for an S&M bar.)

dl

On 12/19/2010 2:59 PM, Philip Carli wrote:
> Well, both sides of course have their creepinesses, doing both and knowing both myself.  It's a little unsettling that the motion picture poster-child for record collecting is the excellent, but distinctly off-kilter, Steve Buscemi in _Ghost World_... P Carli
>
> ________________________________________
> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com [78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Michael Biel [mbiel at mbiel.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 1:36 AM
> To: 78-L Mail List
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Who says some phono collectors aren't creepy?
>
> On 12/18/2010 11:52 PM, neechevoneeznayou at gmail.com wrote:
>> perhaps they turn the crank backwards to avoid making noise while taking
>> dialogue during a scene. Of course if they crank in CU it wouldn't
>> matter, they might want the noise
>>
>> joe salerno
>>
>>
>
> HUH?????  Except for the motorless hand-crank Berliners or tinfoil
> machines, turning a crank backwards only unscrews or detaches the crank,
> not cause the turntable to turn backwards.  There was no dialog in this
> scene, and in making movies, if there is on-set noise they don't want
> they re-record the dialog in a technique called "looping".
>
>> On 12/18/2010 9:15 PM, Vincent Fitzpatrick wrote:
>>> Why do so many gramophones in the movies turn backwards?
>
> What examples do you have?  I'm not sure about this one because the
> youtube stream was herky-jerky and there were not enough frames to
> determine which way the turntable was turning, at least on my computer.
>
>>>    And how to people
>>> get 78s of recordings made in the 1960s, 70s, 80s, and 90s?
>>>
>
> Examples???  This one starts with the sound of the music from what could
> be any recording of it, and then dissolves into a modern sound of the
> recording because the hi-fi sound is more dramatic and is better
> understood by today's audience.  I don't think they are claiming that
> the hi-fi recording is coming out of the horn, or that the 78 was a
> modern recording.  This was not a modern piece of music.  It had been
> recorded in the 78 era.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Steve Ramm<steveramm78l at hotmail.com>
>>>     wrote:
>>>
>>>> This was shared on another newsgroup and I thought others might want to see
>>>> it:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pcfz3zt2DDo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>> _____
>
> And Steve, I never said that some phono collectors aren't creepy.  Some
> are VERY creepy.  But after all, we here on the 78-L are RECORD
> collectors, not PHONOGRAPH collectors!!!!!
>
> Mike Biel   mbiel at mbiel.com
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
> This email message and any attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from using the information in any way, including but not limited to disclosure of, copying, forwarding or acting in reliance on the contents. If you have received this email by error, please immediately notify me by return email and delete it from your email system. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>