[78-L] Decca 100 & 101
Rockined1
rockined1 at aol.com
Thu Sep 23 02:17:19 PDT 2010
well...they're on the Bay now!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: mbiel at mbiel.com <mbiel at mbiel.com>
To: 78-l at 78-l.com; mbiel at mbiel.com <mbiel at mbiel.com>
Cc: 78-l at 78online.com
Sent: Wed, Sep 22, 2010 11:09 pm
Subject: Re: [78-L] Decca 100 & 101
Michael Biel mbiel at mbiel.com
ent from Mobile Email
------Original Message------
rom: mbiel at mbiel.com <mbiel at mbiel.com>
o: <78-l at 78-l.com>,"mbiel at mbiel.com" <mbiel at mbiel.com>
ate: Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:59:52 AM GMT+00:00
ubject: Re: Re: [78-L] Decca 100 & 101
geoffrey wheeler printed the too large story in his book saying it was Gennett
ho pressesd them. But someone here who i misinter preted proved that all the
ukeboxes of that era could take them and even larger discs to maybe10 1/4.
hese two were in print for a long time but i don't think I have 10.0 copies.
Michael Biel mbiel at mbiel.com
ent from Mobile Email
------Original Message------
rom: Jeff Sultanof <jeffsultanof at gmail.com>
o: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
ate: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 8:01:03 PM GMT-4
ubject: Re: [78-L] Decca 100 & 101
I also remember reading that. The pressings I examined must have been later
han these. They were regular size.
Jeff Sultanof
The first
> pressings were too large for the juke boxes and had to be returned, so
the
> story goes.
>
> dl
>
> On 9/22/2010 4:30 PM, Jeff Sultanof wrote:
>> Those early Deccas are an interesting lot. Does anyone know who pressed
>> them? The copies I've examined are pretty bad, worse than Decca product
>> issued even six months later.
>>
______________________________________________
8-L mailing list
8-L at klickitat.78online.com
ttp://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
______________________________________________
8-L mailing list
8-L at klickitat.78online.com
ttp://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
More information about the 78-L
mailing list