[78-L] Decca 100 & 101

[mbiel at mbiel.com]

Michael Biel mbiel at mbiel.com
Sent from Mobile Email

------Original Message------
From: mbiel at mbiel.com <mbiel at mbiel.com>
To: <78-l at 78-l.com>,"mbiel at mbiel.com" <mbiel at mbiel.com>
Date: Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:59:52 AM GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: Re: [78-L] Decca 100 & 101

geoffrey wheeler printed the too large story in his book saying it was Gennett who pressesd them.   But someone  here who i misinter preted proved that all the jukeboxes of that era could take them and even larger discs to maybe10 1/4.  These two were in print for a long time but i don't think I have 10.0 copies.

Michael Biel mbiel at mbiel.com
Sent from Mobile Email

------Original Message------
From: Jeff Sultanof <jeffsultanof at gmail.com>
To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Date: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 8:01:03 PM GMT-4
Subject: Re: [78-L] Decca 100 & 101

I also remember reading that. The pressings I examined must have been later
than these. They were regular size.

Jeff Sultanof


>  The first
> > pressings were too large for the juke boxes and had to be returned, so
> the
> > story goes.
> >
> > dl
> >
> > On 9/22/2010 4:30 PM, Jeff Sultanof wrote:
> >> Those early Deccas are an interesting lot. Does anyone know who pressed
> >> them? The copies I've examined are pretty bad, worse than Decca product
> >> issued even six months later.
> >>
>
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l