[78-L] Bing Article in today's WSJ

[simmonssomer]

It's not only careless editing but illiterate as well.
"If bing Crosby WEREN'T" is correct English ...not "wasn't"
But it don't not bother me no more.  It's all over the place,

Al S.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <fnarf at comcast.net>
To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [78-L] Bing Article in today's WSJ


> There's a very important word -- "If" -- missing from the beginning of 
> that first sentence. Surprising to see such sloppy copy editing in the 
> WSJ.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Ramm" <steveramm78l at hotmail.com>
> To: "78-l 78-l" <78-l at 78online.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 5:50:31 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
> Subject: [78-L] Bing Article in today's WSJ
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/24nmwfu
>
>
>
>
>
> Steve Ramm
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l