[78-L] Lincoln Records

[Randy Skretvedt]

--- On Mon, 3/22/10, 78-l-request at klickitat.78online.com <78-l-request at klickitat.78online.com> wrote:

> From: 78-l-request at klickitat.78online.com <78-l-request at klickitat.78online.com>
> Subject: 78-L Digest, Vol 18, Issue 57
> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
> Date: Monday, March 22, 2010, 12:00 PM
> Send 78-L mailing list submissions
> to
>     78-l at klickitat.78online.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>     http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
> to
>     78-l-request at klickitat.78online.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>     78-l-owner at klickitat.78online.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific
> than "Re: Contents of 78-L digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re:  Lincoln Records (Michael
> Biel)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:35:12 -0400
> From: Michael Biel <mbiel at mbiel.com>
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Lincoln Records
> To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Message-ID: <4BA7B860.9070103 at mbiel.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> 
> David Lennick wrote:
> > Linked with Cameo, wasn't it? 
> 
> Yes.  Not anywhere near as common as Cameo -- I've
> wondered what its 
> distribution was.  

Is there any chance that Lincoln records were sold through a chain store that was in California, or at least west of the Mississippi?  They seem to be fairly common here in Southern California.