[78-L] Removal of hiss - a different approach
neechevoneeznayou at gmail.com
neechevoneeznayou at gmail.com
Thu Feb 11 09:34:00 PST 2010
If the record is damaged by a wet play, cleaning it would be a good
thing to do for some other issue, but not for correcting the surface damage.
joe salerno
David Lennick wrote:
> Robert M. Bratcher Jr. wrote:
>> At 09:33 AM 2/7/2010, you wrote:
>>> neechevoneeznayou at gmail.com wrote:
>>>> OK, in stead of attempting to remove noise/hiss by scanning a record, is
>>>> there a way to chemically treat the surface to smooth out small
>>>> imperfections that would cause noise?
>>>>
>>> Careful, Joe, you are treading on very dangerous ground here, It is
>>> called "wet playing" and is very controversial. The distilled water (or
>>> maybe some other fluid) would fill in gaps and give a smooth surface for
>>> the needle to skate over. But it really is like hydroplaning on a wet
>>> road. Your tires lose actual contact with the road and are floating on
>>> a cushion of water. Something you do not want to do.
>> From what I've read on wet playing of records is once you play wet
>> you have to stay wet with that record from now on as dry playback
>> sounds worse once you wet play a record.
>>
> Wouldn't a good cleaning with the Monks solve the problem of discs that had
> been wet-played? It works just fine for LPs that have been cleaned and put away
> wet in plastic-lined sleeves.
>
> dl
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
More information about the 78-L
mailing list