[78-L] Dumb Gennetts

[David Lennick]

I don't see how you could "dumb down" the sound without dubbing it or how 
Varsity reissues could be better if dubbed from the issued versions, unless 
someone was a genius at EQing.  It is true however that records recorded "too 
well" would fail the wear test. I also understand that because so many 
collectors in Britain preferred acoustical players, many recordings were 
equalized to play well on those machines.

Then there are those Edith Piaf Polydors, which seem equalized to sound as if 
they're being PLAYED on an acoustic machine.

dl

Malcolm Rockwell wrote:
> Thanks, Al.
> So Gennett "dumbed down" the stampers? If the Varsity pressings are 
> better that would mean that the mother was untouched and new stampers 
> were pulled from the "clean" mother. Still can't see how low-end 
> response would be cut doing that.
> Malcolm
> 
> *******
> 
> Al Haug wrote:
>> Kennedy in 78Q number 8, page 47. Opinion on Varsity is my own.
>>
>> 2010/1/8 Malcolm Rockwell <malcolm at 78data.com>
>>
>>   
>>> Who wrote it and what issue is it in?
>>> Malcolm
>>>
>>> *******
>>>
>>> Al Haug wrote:
>>>     
>>>> An article in 78 Quarterly stated that Gennett regularly "dumbed down"
>>>>       
>>> their
>>>     
>>>> sound quality so the records would sound ok on the wind-up phonographs
>>>>       
>>> that
>>>     
>>>> their hillbilly and blues customers were likely to have, much to the
>>>>       
>>> chagrin
>>>     
>>>> of their engineers. Varsity reissues of this material often sounds
>>>>       
>>> better.
>>>     
>>>> 2010/1/8 Michael Biel <mbiel at mbiel.com>
>>>>
>>>>