[78-L] The difference between 78 and 33 RPM records

[Rodger Holtin]

The original sites cited in this entire thread should be posted on the Uncyclopedia. 
(It is to Wikipedia as The Onion is to "journalism.")
Just found out about it today - funny, funny stuff - and just right for those who think a gramophone will play records with no grooves.  [Any Edison phonograph, as you know, really will play records with no grooves, but that information is only for us congicati.]

Rodger



For Best Results use Victor Needles.



.

--- On Fri, 1/1/10, Milan P Milovanovic <milanpmilovanovic4 at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Milan P Milovanovic <milanpmilovanovic4 at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [78-L] The difference between 78 and 33 RPM records
To: 78-l at 78online.com
Date: Friday, January 1, 2010, 9:06 PM

And, also Decelith foils were covered with "special surface for hardening" 
(sic!)

http://www.answers.com/topic/gramophone-record-1

Gee...




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Lichtman" <jeff at swazoo.com>
To: <78-l at 78online.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 1:19 AM
Subject: [78-L] The difference between 78 and 33 RPM records


> How interesting to learn that 78s could hold only one song because
> they had no grooves:
>
> http://www.ehow.com/facts_5777428_difference-_amp_-33-rpm-records.html
>
>                        -        Jeff Lichtman
>                                 jeff at swazoo.com
>                                 Check out Swazoo Koolak's Web Jukebox at
>                                 http://swazoo.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l 

_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l