[78-L] Molly Picon was Alex Steinweiss article

[Thomas Stern]

If anyone scans the Molly Picon album, I'd appreciate a
copy of the cover and notes.  THANKS!
Best wishes, Thomas.

-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
[mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com]On Behalf Of David Lennick
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 5:24 PM
To: 78-L Mail List
Subject: Re: [78-L] Alex Steinweiss article


Toscanini's recording of Beethoven's Symphony #5 (Victor M 640) had a full
color picture of Toscanini from Day 1, possibly on both front and back covers.
Recorded February-March 1939, not sure of release date.

The Molly Picon album was recorded in October 1939 so it might be too late an
issue for this argument.

dl

david.diehl at hensteeth.com wrote:
> The Fiske LMS album has a charicature of Dwight on the cover. It was released in the Fall of 1939.
>  DJD
> Visit the Blue Pages: the Encyclopedic Guide to 78 RPM Party Records
> http://www.hensteeth.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Lennick [mailto:dlennick at sympatico.ca]
> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 05:09 PM
> To: '78-L Mail List'
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Alex Steinweiss article
>
> I forgot to cite Liberty Music Shop.."Thirty Minutes with Beatrice Lillie", 1939, has a picture cover. (Same one was used on the
10" LP.) I can't remember whether the Dwight Fiske album has one as well and it's too cold in the garage to go and check
it.dlRodger Holtin wrote:> Back about 1979 or so, Miles Krueger wrote a book about "Show Boat" (correct title escapes me -
published by Oxford University Press or somebody like that) and he discussed the original 1932 Brunswick album with its original
artwork and compared it to the Columbia re-issue with Steinweiss artwork. While this is not primary source material, it is a
credible, published reference, probably still available somewhere, and reinforces the concept we are trying to re-establish.> >
Rodger> > > > For Best Results use Victor Needles.> > > > .> > --- On Mon, 12/28/09, fnarf at comcast.net  wrote:> > From:
fnarf at comcast.net > Subject: Re: [78-L] Alex Steinweiss article> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.c
om>
>  > Date: Monday, December 28, 2009, 2:20 PM> > This is important! While the ramblings of a delightful bunch of old coots is very
enjoyable, it's not evidence. People saying "Steinweiss wasn't first" aren't any more reliable than people saying "Steinweiss was
first" without some solid documentary proof. Without it, journalists and authors are right to ignore us.> > > > ----- Original
Message -----> From: "Cary Ginell" > To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 11:52:04 AM GMT -08:00
US/Canada Pacific> Subject: Re: [78-L] Alex Steinweiss article> > > Liesl Bradner has asked me for permission to print my comments
as a letter-to-the-editor, to be published in next Sunday's L.A. Times Calendar edition.> > ... ... ...> > > >
_______________________________________________78-L mailing
list78-L at klickitat.78online.comhttp://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l