[78-L] Tart remark

[David Lennick]

Butter, of course.

dl

Bud Black wrote:
> I personally prefer tarts!
> 
> Bud 
>  
> -------Original Message-------
>  
> From: Sean Miller
> Date: 10/29/09 21:22:32
> To: '78-L Mail List'
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Tart remark
>  
> Yeah, sure...hah.
>  
> Sean
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
> [mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Taylor Bowie
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:15 PM
> To: 78-L Mail List
> Subject: [78-L] Tart remark
>  
> I don't know how I did it,  but in the message below I meant to type "that"
> and not "tart."
>  
> T
>  
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Taylor Bowie" <bowiebks at isomedia.com>
> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Babe Ruth Record !! with original? photo
>  
>  
>> One thing I've learned is that the market for 78s is more inconsistent
>> than
>> that of almost any other "collectable" material.
>>
>> A record can sell for $100 on eBay one week, and a better copy can't even
>> hit $20 a moth later.  I had the faux Ruth record for sale at a book fair
>> and sold it easily for the $250.  What tart or any record is "worth" will
>> always remain up to the buyer.
>>
>> Taylor
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Lennick" <dlennick at sympatico.ca>
>> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 5:32 PM
>> Subject: Re: [78-L] Babe Ruth Record !! with original? photo
>>
>>
>>> Baseball related records actually do sell. But I own at least one of the
>>> Ruth
>>> discs (probably the real one, with the guy with the disease) and it
>>> didn't
>>> cost
>>> that much.
>>>
>>> dl
>>>
>>> Taylor Bowie wrote:
>>>> It seems to have some value to baseball collectors.  About ten years ago
>>>> I
>>>> sold  a V+ copy of the record to a baseball guy for 250.  Being
>>>> generous,
>>>> I'd figure the gravure image (it's not a real photo) is worth another
>>>> hundred.
>>>>
>>>> Beware of anyone selling ANYTHING when they tell you that the treasure
>>>> in
>>>> question "should be in a museum."
>>>>
>>>> Taylor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: <bruce78rpm at comcast.net>
>>>> To: "78-L" <78-L at 78online.com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 4:19 PM
>>>> Subject: [78-L] Babe Ruth Record !! with original? photo
>>>>
>>>>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/BABE-RUTH-ORIGINAL-1920-PATHE-PHONOGRAPH-RECORD-PHOTO_W0
> QQitemZ400075807019QQcmdZViewItemQQptZVintage_Sports_Memorabilia?hash=item5d
> 2660592b
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh my, once again it's the Babe Ruth Pathe Actuelle record resurfacing
>>>>> again, but look, this one has an original photo that is marked Pathe on
>>>>> the back that must have been given out when you purchased the record.
>>>>> This
>>>>> is the first time I have seen the photo card. Wonder what this package
>>>>> (record which is not him, but with the photo) might be worth, any
>>>>> ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>> _______________________
>>>
>>>