[78-L] Tit for Tart

[Taylor Bowie]

Sean,  I intended no offense to any tarts,  either!  But they same rule 
should apply to what they are worth,  right?

Taylor


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sean Miller" <smille1 at nycap.rr.com>
To: "'78-L Mail List'" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [78-L] Tart remark


> Yeah, sure...hah.
>
> Sean
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
> [mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Taylor Bowie
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:15 PM
> To: 78-L Mail List
> Subject: [78-L] Tart remark
>
> I don't know how I did it,  but in the message below I meant to type 
> "that"
> and not "tart."
>
> T
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Taylor Bowie" <bowiebks at isomedia.com>
> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Babe Ruth Record !! with original? photo
>
>
>> One thing I've learned is that the market for 78s is more inconsistent
>> than
>> that of almost any other "collectable" material.
>>
>> A record can sell for $100 on eBay one week, and a better copy can't even
>> hit $20 a moth later.  I had the faux Ruth record for sale at a book fair
>> and sold it easily for the $250.  What tart or any record is "worth" will
>> always remain up to the buyer.
>>
>> Taylor
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "David Lennick" <dlennick at sympatico.ca>
>> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 5:32 PM
>> Subject: Re: [78-L] Babe Ruth Record !! with original? photo
>>
>>
>>> Baseball related records actually do sell. But I own at least one of the
>>> Ruth
>>> discs (probably the real one, with the guy with the disease) and it
>>> didn't
>>> cost
>>> that much.
>>>
>>> dl
>>>
>>> Taylor Bowie wrote:
>>>> It seems to have some value to baseball collectors.  About ten years 
>>>> ago
>>>> I
>>>> sold  a V+ copy of the record to a baseball guy for 250.  Being
>>>> generous,
>>>> I'd figure the gravure image (it's not a real photo) is worth another
>>>> hundred.
>>>>
>>>> Beware of anyone selling ANYTHING when they tell you that the treasure
>>>> in
>>>> question "should be in a museum."
>>>>
>>>> Taylor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: <bruce78rpm at comcast.net>
>>>> To: "78-L" <78-L at 78online.com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 4:19 PM
>>>> Subject: [78-L] Babe Ruth Record !! with original? photo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/BABE-RUTH-ORIGINAL-1920-PATHE-PHONOGRAPH-RECORD-PHOTO_W0
> QQitemZ400075807019QQcmdZViewItemQQptZVintage_Sports_Memorabilia?hash=item5d
> 2660592b
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh my, once again it's the Babe Ruth Pathe Actuelle record resurfacing
>>>>> again, but look, this one has an original photo that is marked Pathe 
>>>>> on
>>>>> the back that must have been given out when you purchased the record.
>>>>> This
>>>>> is the first time I have seen the photo card. Wonder what this package
>>>>> (record which is not him, but with the photo) might be worth, any
>>>>> ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>> _______________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 78-L mailing list
>>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>