[78-L] From Brad K: The Last Generic Songster?

[Taylor Bowie]

I don't follow this thread..what makes the ones "generic" and the others 
not?   Is someone saying that the crooners were distinct from each other in 
a way that Arthur Fields couldn't be distinguished from Murray or Kaufman or 
Harry Richman?  Doesn't make sense to me...all the singers mentioned of both 
eras sound quite distinctive to me.

Taylor (confused once again)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Weiner" <djwein at earthlink.net>
To: "'78-L Mail List'" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [78-L] From Brad K: The Last Generic Songster?


Or Smith Ballew.

-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
[mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Bud Black
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 8:56 PM
To: 78-L Mail List
Subject: Re: [78-L] From Brad K: The Last Generic Songster?

Hey, not necessarily!  Don't forget Harry Richman.

Bud

-------Original Message-------

From: Michael Biel
Date: 04/06/09 20:18:22
To: 78-L Mail List
Subject: [78-L] From Brad K: The Last Generic Songster?

Okay, here's an idle question about popular singing:  We know that by the
early '30s, the "intimate" Crosby/Columbo/Vallée style had all but
supplanted the
"generic" style of Billy Murray/Irving Kaufman/Arthur Fields.  What and When
were the last or latest song(s) on record, featuring an unapologetically
"generic" vocal?

I guess that by 1933 they were totally extinct.   What say y'all?

Brad Kay SUPRBATONE at aol.com

_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l

_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l

_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l