[78-L] Dubbed contemporary matrix questions (Columbia related).

[Royal Pemberton]

I have no idea.  The data I quoted came off Tyrone's site.

On 12/29/08, David Lennick <dlennick at sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Nope..the Columbia books show only the Columbia matrix numbers, not the ARC
> ones, and Ross Laird's Brunswick books stop when Brunswick becomes part of
> ARC.
> Is this gap covered anywhere?
>
> The Columbia books leave an even more infuriating gap in the twelve inch
> masters by cutting off in 1931, even though activity continued through '34.
>
> dl
>
> Royal Pemberton wrote:
>> Is there any record (no pun intended) of what was done in that same
>> studio across that one-month interval, between 7 July and 6 August?
>> (I don't have any ARC items on any of their labels recorded in this
>> same period, to have any idea of when Brunswick or the other labels
>> began to have matrices recorded with the Columbia equipment.)
>>
>> On 12/29/08, David Lennick <dlennick at sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>> Royal Pemberton wrote:
>>>> BTW, the last matrix I know of in the 140XXX/150XXX range is 152772,
>>>> 'If it ain't love' by Chick Webb which was issued on Okeh 41571 and
>>>> others, recorded 6th July 1934.
>>> By golly, he's right..that's the last listing in the Columbia Master
>>> Books
>>> Volume III (10-inch discs, 1924-34).
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>