[78-L] Stereo copies?

[P G C]

It is written "recorded in stereo", it is the album back cover, maybe the record itself is mono, I don't know.

Any suggestions on how to find out? 


________________________________
From: David Lennick <dlennick at sympatico.ca>
To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 11:02:05 PM
Subject: Re: [78-L] Stereo copies?

David Weiner wrote:
> But do you see them in STEREO??  We know they are out them in mono, but 
> do you see STEREO copies??????  THAT is what the discussion was about.  
> Plus the fact that there HAS already been two CD issues.
> 
> Mike Biel  mbiel at mbiel.com
> _______________________________________________
> 
> What I don't get is that stereo was such a big deal - promoted to the hilt
> in the late 50s-early 60s, with "stereo" emblazoned proudly across record
> jackets - WB being one of the most blatant - and incidentally, also a way to
> squeeze and extra buck out of consumers. So isn't  it a bit odd that by
> 1962, stores were discouraging customers from asking for stereo copies of
> THE FIRST FAMILY and WB's MY SON, THE FOLKSINGER by not even bothering to
> carry or order them?  
> 
> Dave W.
> 
Often times, the only way I find certain albums in stereo is to go through 
radio station libraries. Stereo DID cost a buck more, and if you read through 
old Hi Fi magazines of the time as I'm doing these days, you'll notice that the 
reviewers listened carefully to both versions of everything and often didn't 
see the need for stereo except for large scale classical works and Broadway 
shows. Plus the ping pong stuff.

At least Tom Lehrer admitted it when he charged you an extra buck for a live 
version, two extra bucks for live AND stereo..

dl
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l