[78-L] Pseudononymous Camden LPs [FWD]
Mike Harkin
harkinmike at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 16 23:40:56 PST 2008
Weren't they from 78's? I would think RCA wanted to keep making money from them -- always the main consideration of a Record Company, after all
-- without competing too strongly with their newer LP/Lp versions.
Mike in Plovdiv
--- On Sun, 11/16/08, Randy Watts <rew1014 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Randy Watts <rew1014 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [78-L] Pseudononymous Camden LPs
> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Date: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 8:01 PM
> Does anyone have any idea why Camden, RCA Victor's
> budget label, used pseudonyms on most of its early LPs? The
> performances are by name orchestras, reissued from RCA
> Victor's back catalog, but are generally identified as
> by Warwick Symphony Orchestra, Festival Concert Orchestra,
> Sussex Symphony Orchestra, or some such, and with no
> conductor credit at all.
>
> Randy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
More information about the 78-L
mailing list