[78-L] Goldmine article on value of ODJB original 78

David Weiner djwein at earthlink.net
Sat Nov 8 10:09:15 PST 2008



-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
[mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Chris Zwarg
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 11:36 AM
To: 78-L Mail List
Subject: Re: [78-L] Goldmine article on value of ODJB original 78

At 17:25 08.11.2008, you wrote:
>From: Steve Ramm <steveramm78l at hotmail.com>
>> I happened to see this today and thought you guys (and gals)
>> would get a kick out of it. Go to this URL and look at the
>> SECOND letter in Tim Neely's letter column.
>>  http://tinyurl.com/5jvhk7     Steve
>
>Reasonable, $4-20 valuation, and the guy did OK for 50 cents which is
>what we usually see it at.  Were there really all these label changes
>Neely mentions?  I don't recall ever seeing this particular record with
>a label other than Original Dixieland Jass Band.  Never Jazz for this
>record, but Jazz on all their later records.  Interesting his modern
>interpretation of "Introducing . . ." as a label indication of the song
>they "stole". 

If they had "stolen" it, why would they mention it openly on the label?! 

-----
Because a court case forced them to!  The composers of "That Teasin' Rag"
took the band to court for using their song without attribution or
compensation.   And I HAVE seen the disc with all three label variations
mentioned in the article.  Ironically, the 1997 vinyl 45 repressing is MUCH
harder to find than the original disc. 

Dave W.




More information about the 78-L mailing list