[78-L] 1952 lacquer record question

[Tim Huskisson]

Still here.
Tim Huskisson

-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
[mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Ron Roscoe
Sent: 29 August 2022 19:02
To: '78-L Mail List'
Subject: Re: [78-L] 1952 lacquer record question


I'm still here as well!

Ron R

-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
[mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Ron L"Herault
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 11:12 PM
To: '78-L Mail List'
Subject: Re: [78-L] 1952 lacquer record question


I'm here too.  I doubt trying the  larger stylus will hurt the record!

Ron L

-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
<78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com> On Behalf Of Malcolm
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 3:15 PM
To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Subject: Re: [78-L] 1952 lacquer record question


Hi Taylor, Hi Dave.
Nice to hear from you both. That means there are at least 3 of us still on
78L!
I'm going to try the flip side with an LP stylus. At the weights we're using
nowadays it shouldn't be a problem.
Label sez that tracking should be no more than 2 ounces. That made sense in
1952, but not for an LP.
I think I will be able to stay under that.
Mal

*******

On 8/25/2022 7:46 AM, dlennick wrote:
> I've wondered about that myself..I have a 16" that looks as if it's 
> fine grooved.
>
> dl
>
>
>      ------ Original Message ------
>      From: bowiebks at isomedia.com.invalid
>      To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
>      Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 1:21 PM
>      Subject: Re: [78-L] 1952 lacquer record question
>
>
>    Malcolm,
>
>    I have no information on this record but wanted to let you know 
> that I'm
>    still here,  and always glad to hear from anyone on the list!
>
>    Best to all from
>
>    Taylor Bowie
>
>
>
>
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
>    <78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com> On Behalf Of Malcolm
>    Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 10:16 AM
>    To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>    Subject: [78-L] 1952 lacquer record question
>
>
>    Hello to whoever is left on this list!
>    I recently received a 1952 NBC Reference Recording #113 - a sound 
> effects
>    record. It's called "Buzzing Sound" and penned in below that is 
> "Flying
>    Saucers". It is a 78... BUT it looks to me as if it is meant to be 
> played
>    with a LP stylus. The grooves per inch are high and the groove 
> itself is far
>    thinner than that of a normal 78. Was this the case with other NBC
>    instantaneous discs from the time? - I want to avoid damaging the 
> recording
>    by using a 2.7 mil 78 stylus if that is so. Thus my question.
>    Aloha,
>    Malcolm R
>    _______________________________________________
>    78-L mailing list
>    78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>    http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>    _______________________________________________
>    78-L mailing list
>    78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>    http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l

_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l

_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l

_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l