[78-L] 1952 lacquer record question

dlennick dlennick dlennick at sympatico.ca.invalid
Thu Aug 25 10:46:14 PDT 2022


I've wondered about that myself..I have a 16" that looks as if it's fine 
grooved.

dl


    ------ Original Message ------
    From: bowiebks at isomedia.com.invalid
    To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
    Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 1:21 PM
    Subject: Re: [78-L] 1952 lacquer record question


  Malcolm,

  I have no information on this record but wanted to let you know that 
I'm
  still here,  and always glad to hear from anyone on the list!

  Best to all from

  Taylor Bowie




  -----Original Message-----
  From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
  <78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com> On Behalf Of Malcolm
  Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 10:16 AM
  To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
  Subject: [78-L] 1952 lacquer record question


  Hello to whoever is left on this list!
  I recently received a 1952 NBC Reference Recording #113 - a sound 
effects
  record. It's called "Buzzing Sound" and penned in below that is 
"Flying
  Saucers". It is a 78... BUT it looks to me as if it is meant to be 
played
  with a LP stylus. The grooves per inch are high and the groove itself 
is far
  thinner than that of a normal 78. Was this the case with other NBC
  instantaneous discs from the time? - I want to avoid damaging the 
recording
  by using a 2.7 mil 78 stylus if that is so. Thus my question.
  Aloha,
  Malcolm R
  _______________________________________________
  78-L mailing list
  78-L at klickitat.78online.com
  http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l

  _______________________________________________
  78-L mailing list
  78-L at klickitat.78online.com
  http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l






More information about the 78-L mailing list