[78-L] 1952 lacquer record question
dlennick dlennick
dlennick at sympatico.ca.invalid
Thu Aug 25 10:46:14 PDT 2022
I've wondered about that myself..I have a 16" that looks as if it's fine
grooved.
dl
------ Original Message ------
From: bowiebks at isomedia.com.invalid
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: [78-L] 1952 lacquer record question
Malcolm,
I have no information on this record but wanted to let you know that
I'm
still here, and always glad to hear from anyone on the list!
Best to all from
Taylor Bowie
-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
<78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com> On Behalf Of Malcolm
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 10:16 AM
To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Subject: [78-L] 1952 lacquer record question
Hello to whoever is left on this list!
I recently received a 1952 NBC Reference Recording #113 - a sound
effects
record. It's called "Buzzing Sound" and penned in below that is
"Flying
Saucers". It is a 78... BUT it looks to me as if it is meant to be
played
with a LP stylus. The grooves per inch are high and the groove itself
is far
thinner than that of a normal 78. Was this the case with other NBC
instantaneous discs from the time? - I want to avoid damaging the
recording
by using a 2.7 mil 78 stylus if that is so. Thus my question.
Aloha,
Malcolm R
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
More information about the 78-L
mailing list