[78-L] Ethel Stanley, et al

[Malcolm]

Rings a bell, Dave. But it's probably someone else. A googling I shall go.
In cases like this what usually happens is I come up out of a deep sleep 
at 4 in the morning going, "HOO HAH!" as a name surfaces from the 
depths. I write it down, go back to sleep and upon awakening note that 
my scrawl says "Grpblt Qoxlprty!" or the like.
Boy could she sing?
Malcolm

*******

On 2/19/2020 6:40 AM, David Lennick wrote:
>   Ever heard Lillie Delk Christian?
>
> At least Darlene Edwards was doing it as a gag. Lots of lps..she also sang offkey with Red Ingle and Tommy Dorsey.
>
> dl
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------
> From: Malcolm <malcolm at 78data.com.invalid>
> To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Date: February 19, 2020 at 11:32 AM
> Subject: [78-L] Ethel Stanley, et al (was: Guardian article)
>
>
> In today's collecting market hat must mean she's good.
> If the likes of Lady Florence (Florence Foster Jenkins) can bring in
> $400 a record
> then Ethel should be right up... er, down... there too.
> Then there's Darlene Edwards (Jo Stafford) and her hubby who carried on
> her tradition.
> They don't bring the big bucks for their records but are still great
> fun. It's hard to sing sharp!
> Unfortunately the Edwards' didn't record on 78s, but there are at least
> 2 albums.
> There is one other major 78 artist I know of who sang like FFJ but my
> forgetter is
> seemingly on overtime today.
> Who was it?
> Malcolm
>
> *******
>
> On 2/18/2020 8:36 AM, Royal Pemberton wrote:
>> Good God Ethel Stanley was horrible. You'd have thought that as bad as she
>> was she would never have been allowed to make even a test recording.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:49 PM Ron Roscoe <jamesw.henryb at gmail.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you.
>>> Ron
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
>>> [mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Francesco
>>> Martinelli
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 2:42 AM
>>> To: 78-L Mail List
>>> Subject: Re: [78-L] Guardian article : Nightmares on wax -- the re-embrace
>>> of
>>> vinyl, and the environmental impact
>>>
>>>
>>> the guy did a presentation somewhere presenting a slide with a crapophone
>>> representing 78 era. Didnt look good. At least in Downton Abbey had the
>>> right visuals.fm
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 1:28 AM Jeffrey Lichtman <jeff at swazoo.com.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The URL was broken over two lines. Try this:
>>>>
>>>> https://tinyurl.com/s7avwx2
>>>>
>>>> On 2/17/2020 3:29 PM, Ron Roscoe wrote:
>>>>> Error 404: Nothing at this link.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron Roscoe
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
>>>>> [mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Mark
>>>> Bardenwerper
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 11:24 PM
>>>>> To: 78-L Mail List
>>>>> Subject: Re: [78-L] Guardian article : Nightmares on wax -- the
>>>> re-embrace of
>>>>> vinyl, and the environmental impact
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/11/2020 9:37 PM, Lloyd Davies wrote:
>>>>>
>>> https://www.theguardian.com/music/2020/jan/28/vinyl-record-revival-environmental
>>>>> -impact-music-industry-streaming
>>>>>> American presses supplied by a secretive Thai plastic company VS
>>>> billions of
>>>>> streamers expecting instant access to music via devices they will soon
>>>> throw
>>>>> away.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Good thing I am doing my part, keeping all this carbon sequestered in
>>> my
>>>>> 78's!
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> jeff at swazoo.com
>>>> Check out Swazoo Koolak Photography
>>>> at http://swazoo.com/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 78-L mailing list
>>>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>>>
>>> --
>>> inviato dal mio pulsatore a bassa cutena
>>> Francesco Martinelli
>>> Lungarno Mediceo 10
>>> 56127 P I S A I T A L Y
>>> +39 335 5617207
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 78-L mailing list
>>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 78-L mailing list
>>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l